Analysis: Historic 14-Day Teacher Strike in New Haven, California, Ends With Deal in Which Educators Lost Money
;)
Education news and commentary, delivered right to your inbox.
Sign up for 蜜桃影视 newsletter.
Mike Antonucci鈥檚 Union Report appears most Wednesdays; see the full archive.
Teachers in California鈥檚 New Haven Unified School District voted 302 to 200 Sunday to ratify a two-year contract, ending a 14-day strike.
鈥淥ur unity with each other on the picket lines was an incredible display of power that resulted in some real gains for our union,鈥� said Joe Ku鈥檈 Angeles, president of the New Haven Teachers Association. 鈥淲e have made history together.鈥�
The history may be great, but the math isn鈥檛.
The new contract gives teachers a 3 percent raise this year, but effective only on January 1. They will get an additional 3 percent next year. The district also granted a one-time 2.5 percent bonus for this year.
For a teacher previously earning $75,000, that鈥檚 a one-time bonus of $1,875, an effective raise of $1,125 this year, and an additional $2,284 next year (3 percent of $76,125). That鈥檚 a total of $5,284 in more money.
Unfortunately for New Haven teachers, there is a flip side to this ledger. The union鈥檚 bargaining chair 鈥渁cknowledged that teachers overall lost 7.5 percent of their salaries while striking, so those retiring this year will lose money for their efforts.鈥�
Not just retirees. That $75,000-a-year teacher lost $5,625 during the strike, leaving her $341 in the hole even at the end of the second year.
And that鈥檚 assuming the district was offering nothing.
In fact, the district鈥檚 last offer before the strike was a 3 percent bonus and a 1 percent increase. That鈥檚 at least $3,000 in additional money without a strike, depending on whether the increase was for the first year or second.
The union鈥檚 last offer before the strike was for a 10 percent raise over two years.聽If there were other non-salary perks or concessions won by the teachers as a result of the strike, neither the union nor the district is publicizing them.
Looking at the numbers that are known, we can see why 200 teachers voted no. But we can also see why 302 voted yes 鈥� to cut their losses.
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.