蜜桃影视

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 蜜桃影视 Newsletter

The author will be part of an elite panel of experts Wednesday discussing the growing movement to establish a constitutional right to quality public education. Click for details and registration information.

Marking the third Martin Luther King holiday of the pandemic has highlighted the cruel open secret that American public education is decidedly not a civil right. Politicians have talked about education as a civil right for generations. But COVID-19 has exposed those claims as tragically hollow rhetoric. 

A recent New York Times column by David Leonhardt titled “” illustrates how children hold the least risk from COVID but have borne the greatest burden. Leonhardt writes that kids face more risk from car rides than from COVID, but I watched my own daughters sacrifice friends, soccer and full-time in-person school for well over a year. Leonhardt quotes a parent declaring that 鈥渇or so many kids, school represents a safe, comfortable, reliable place, but not for nearly two years now.鈥澛�

As the son of an alcoholic father who committed suicide when I was 16, I found school to be that safe, comfortable, reliable place for me. My teachers saved me. They are the reason I am typing these words right now. 

I expect and demand that public education provide that same safe, comfortable and reliable place for my own daughters. And that鈥檚 exactly what most children, especially low-income children and children of color, have been systemically denied. Even before the pandemic shuttered their schools, of Black students in America were reading at grade level.

Public school parents are pissed. We are organizing across traditional lines of difference because we are recognizing that we have more in common with each other across race, geography, ideology and socioeconomic status than we do with the defenders of an unjust status quo. Many parents at my daughter鈥檚 Los Angeles district school who marched with the teachers union two years ago during their strike have watched from the sidelines as a negotiated reduction in teacher work time cut 12 million instructional hours, which the union then justified with the Orwellian declaration that, “.”

Last year, many of those same grass-roots public school parents organized to file a against the L.A. Unified School District to reopen our schools that had been shuttered for the pandemic. The district鈥檚 response said the quiet part out loud: In its court filing, the district argued that because students do not have a constitutional right to a quality public education, it has no legal obligation to provide one, and parents have no standing to challenge reopening policies, or anything else. 

Parents across Los Angeles and America are revolting against this intransigence. We recently saw the impact of this revolution at the ballot box in , where Democrat Terry McAuliffe lost his gubernatorial race by essentially telling parents to shut up and leave education to the so-called experts. 

Parents are now organizing with advocates in , and several other states to establish a constitutional right to a high-quality public education and a long-overdue seat at the table for public school parents. 

This new right would empower families to hold politicians accountable for actually putting students first. Such a tool would be particularly valuable for communities of color, where politicians and bureaucrats have failed generations of children while ignoring generations of parents.

In his , King wrote, 鈥渁 law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, has no part in enacting or devising the law.鈥� Disenfranchised students forced by law to attend failing public schools that ultimately determine their destiny are poster children for King鈥檚 test. Students cannot vote and parents do not have lobbyists, so without a kids-first constitutional North Star, politicians have little incentive to listen to families or put kids first in the face of special interest opposition. 

Opponents have labeled this theory of change as extreme. But King wrote, 鈥渢he question is not whether we will be extremists but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or love?鈥� Extremists for the status quo contend that establishing a constitutional right to a high-quality public education would . But used that same argument to oppose . Civil rights without leverage to enforce them are merely empty promises. 

King wrote that 鈥渏ustice too long delayed is justice denied.鈥� The children of America have waited long enough for justice. If our children are to inherit a world worthy of King鈥檚 vision, we must heed his call to reject the siren song of moderation: 鈥淲e are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now.鈥�

For the sake of our kids, our democracy and our future, the time is now to be extremists for love. Now is the time to finally translate 鈥渒ids first鈥� from a soundbite into a civil right for the children of America.

Ben Austin is a founding co-partner of , a coalition of nonprofit organizations, community leaders and parents committed to establishing a civil right to a quality education across America

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.