Cardona鈥檚 Role in Connecticut鈥檚 Complex School Desegregation Efforts Becomes Focus: Will He Give Integration a National Platform as Ed Secretary?
While announcing a landmark settlement in one of the nation鈥檚 most significant and fraught school desegregation lawsuits, Miguel Cardona kept his remarks optimistic but brief. Just five months after being appointed Connecticut鈥檚 top education chief, he welcomed a major step forward in a three-decade-long battle over persistent racial segregation in the state鈥檚 capital city, even if his own role was short-lived.
鈥淭oday we are eager and excited about moving forward and moving the conversation from litigation to education,鈥 Cardona, who became President-elect Joe Biden鈥檚 surprise pick for U.S. education secretary last month, said during a press conference in Hartford a year ago this month.
He was referring to the case Sheff v. O鈥橬eill, which began in 1989 and led to a 1996 state Supreme Court ruling that found Hartford children 鈥渟uffer daily鈥 from the 鈥渄evastating effects鈥 of stark racial isolation in the city鈥檚 public schools.
The case has been closely watched on a national level for years and Cardona鈥檚 involvement in it has prompted quick speculation about whether he will bring a new imperative to the Education Department on school desegregation. But the Hartford case 鈥 and Connecticut鈥檚 larger history of racial segregation in schools 鈥斅爄s complex. Defining Cardona as an integration champion depends on who you talk to, particularly when it comes to those from his home state.
Cardona became Connecticut鈥檚 education commissioner 鈥渁t a very late stage but a pretty important stage in the Sheff case,鈥 said Philip Tegeler, executive director of the Washington-based Poverty and Race Research Action Council, and who was among the attorneys to file the 1989 lawsuit. Cardona鈥檚 willingness to speak at the press conference was laudable, he said, and was not emblematic of a bureaucratic posture that often dominates policymaking.
鈥淭hat makes me very optimistic about this secretary and his understanding of the value of school integration,鈥 Tegeler said.
Desegregation efforts in the Hartford region rely on a network of esteemed magnet schools and an 鈥渙pen choice鈥 interdistrict enrollment scheme. They have been lauded by advocates as a way to entice integration between children from the city and those from the surrounding suburbs and were used as the model for a statewide integration initiative.
Some local education activists, however, say the Sheff remedy has failed to live up to its promises, others have questioned whether its voluntary integration scheme is the best approach to providing an equitable education to children in the state鈥檚 underfunded urban schools.
Among critics is Gwen Samuel, founder and president of the Connecticut Parents Union and the plaintiff in a lawsuit against Cardona and other state leaders to halt the statewide school desegregation effort. Samuel argues the undertaking wrongly relies on a “racial quota” in order to meet diversity goals, resulting in coveted seats being set aside for white students while students of color languish on a waiting list. Rather than desegregating schools, Samuel believes that policymakers should focus instead on improving the quality of campuses that primarily serve Black and Latino children.
鈥淲e did terrible with our desegregation efforts,鈥 she said, noting that she agreed with the intent, but not the outcome. 鈥淗ow it rolled out discriminated against the very children that needed those high-quality magnet schools the most. As the U.S. secretary of education, I don鈥檛 want [Cardona] to even look at Connecticut鈥檚 desegregation efforts at all, because then he would force us to organize against him.鈥
Meanwhile, the lawyers representing Samuel, from the libertarian Pacific Legal Foundation, very much want the eyes of Washington, D.C. on Connecticut鈥檚 integration track record. Their intent is that the Supreme Court will take up the case and use it as a way to set a national precedent barring schools from considering race in any way in admissions decisions.
鈥楻estore the soul of America鈥
While the topic of racial isolation in schools often conjures imagery of the segregationist South, Cardona鈥檚 home state has among the most racially divided classrooms in the country. Yet the state鈥檚 persistent divisions are a microcosm of the country at large: More than 65 years after the Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education that laws creating separate schools for Black and white children were unconstitutional, America鈥檚 classrooms remain as divided by race as they were decades ago.
Though several Supreme Court opinions have chipped away at the Brown decision鈥檚 promise over the last few decades, the issue of school desegregation has enjoyed newfound interest in recent years 鈥斅爌articularly after George Floyd鈥檚 death at the hands of a Minneapolis police officer fueled nationwide unrest over racial inequities. Last summer, Black Lives Matter yard signs popped up in Connecticut鈥檚 whitest and poshest cul de sacs, leaving activists hopeful that the reckoning could forge a new path for systemic changes.
Yet, even with the 2020 court settlement, in which Cardona and other state lawmakers committed to a major new investment in integration, a heated debate over desegregation in the Hartford region 鈥 and its national implications 鈥 is far from over.
With Cardona tapped to replace Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, his public remarks on the major civil rights case, albeit limited, suggest to some the possibility of a major shift in the U.S. Education Department鈥檚 tenor on racial integration in America鈥檚 persistently segregated classrooms. School integration advocates have urged Cardona to leverage his experience with the Connecticut case as he joins Biden鈥檚 campaign promise to 鈥渞estore the soul of America.鈥
After attorney Martha Stone met with Cardona in January 2020 to discuss the state鈥檚 commitment to ending racial isolation in Hartford鈥檚 schools, she left with optimism.
Other government leaders have been far less amenable, she told 蜜桃影视. In the three decades since Stone filed the Sheff desegregation case in state court, Connecticut has had nine education commissioners and the Harford district has had 17 superintendents during her fight to secure quality schools for children of color and those from low-income households.
During those years, policymakers鈥 commitment to desegregation has ebbed and flowed. Former Gov. Dannel Malloy, for example, the state鈥檚 desegregation obligations. But under current Gov. Ned Lamont, she said the state was more willing to confront segregation. Under the 2020 settlement agreement, the state agreed to add additional seats to its high-demand magnet schools and spend more than $2 million to facilitate integration, including on recruiting efforts to bolster interest among students in the region鈥檚 affluent, predominantly white suburbs.
Critical for Hartford students was a long-term commitment to fulfilling 厂丑别蹿蹿鈥檚 promise by providing enrollment to an integrated school to any student interested in attending one, Stone said.
鈥淭hat was a significant piece to this latest settlement and it鈥檚 the first time the state had actually agreed to meet demand,鈥 she said. 鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 mean that every student would get an integrated setting 鈥斅燽ut every student that wanted that would have the opportunity.鈥
School integration advocates hope that Cardona will take that success nationally. Among those watching optimistically is Richard Kahlenberg, director of K-12 equity and a senior fellow at The Century Foundation, a progressive think tank in Washington. In a recent report, the group found that some 900 school districts and charter schools nationally . Among them is Minneapolis Public Schools, which approved new attendance boundaries to promote integration just weeks before Floyd鈥檚 death.
Cardona鈥檚 role in the Sheff case should give him 鈥渆nhanced awareness of school integration as an issue,鈥 and, in particular, 鈥渉ow integration can be done well,鈥 Kahlenberg said in an email. 鈥淭o my mind, that鈥檚 a big plus given the critical role that school diversity plays in fostering social mobility and social cohesion.鈥
Gina Chirichigno, director of the National Coalition on School Diversity, is also optimistic about Cardona鈥檚 federal appointment. After Biden鈥檚 presidential victory, her group released a list of 10 changes the Biden administration could make in its first 100 days to prioritize school integration. Number one on the list was nominating an education secretary with a 鈥渄emonstrated commitment to school integration and racial justice.鈥
Though Cardona鈥檚 short tenure as Connecticut鈥檚 education commissioner doesn’t provide 鈥渁 huge amount of evidence in terms or real policies and implementation鈥 related to integration, she said her group has met with the Biden transition team and went away feeling hopeful. The transition team didn鈥檛 respond to requests for comment on this article.

The resistance
Despite optimism circling Cardona鈥檚 appointment, school integration efforts remain deeply divisive 鈥 even on the Democratic campaign trail. During a presidential debate in 2019, Biden found himself defending his opposition to busing as a desegregation strategy in the 1970s when Vice President-elect Kamala Harris, then a Democratic primary rival, put him on blast for finding common ground with segregationist senators.
And while Hartford鈥檚 progress on integration has been lauded nationally, the issue is more contentious on the local level. This became apparent in 2017, when a Hartford Courant found that Black and Latino students were denied magnet school seats in an attempt to maintain racial diversity at the campuses. In some cases, magnet schools that failed to attract enough white or Asian students left seats unfilled rather than enrolling additional Black or Latino students.
The story led to the Pacific Legal lawsuit, which alleged that magnet school enrollment relied on an unconstitutional 鈥渞acial quota鈥 that limited the number of Black and Latino students to 75 percent of the schools鈥 student bodies. In order to promote diversity, the suit alleged, the magnet schools implemented a lottery system that gave preference to white and Asian students.
In an apparent effort to blunt the court challenge, the 2020 Sheff settlement made changes to an overwhelmed lottery system that picks children for sought-after seats in the region’s specialized magnet schools while fulfilling its goal of creating racially diverse settings. Rather than focusing on race, the lottery system considers students鈥 economic status, such as family income and educational attainment.
The change prompted the Pacific Legal attorneys to drop their lawsuit aimed at the Hartford-area integration-focused magnet schools, but their challenge to the statewide desegregation effort that followed Sheff鈥檚 lead goes on. In bolstering its case, the suit alleges a New Haven magnet school because its Black and Latino enrollment, at 91 percent, put it under threat of state sanction. The school failed to meet racial integration goals by not having white and Asian students account for at least 25 percent of enrollment.
Samuel, the plaintiff and Connecticut Parents Union president, urged Cardona against touting Hartford as a desegregation success story. As a resident of Meriden, Cardona鈥檚 hometown, Samuel has known Biden鈥檚 education secretary nominee for years, characterizing him as a 鈥渇amily man鈥 who 鈥渓ooks for paths of least resistance.鈥
But this isn鈥檛 likely a controversy he鈥檒l be able to avoid.
鈥淵ou鈥檙e not going to tell children that the only way they can learn is by sitting in proximity of white children,鈥 she said. Rather than focusing on race, Cardona and other policymakers should prioritize resources, she said, though integration advocates have argued that ending racial isolation could allow money and social clout to flow into all schools. As far as Samuel is concerned, Cardona hasn鈥檛 done enough to weigh in on the topic.
鈥淚 like Miguel as a person,鈥 she said, 鈥渂ut his silence on desegregation is a problem.鈥
The legal threat
Oliver Dunford, a Pacific Legal Foundation attorney, acknowledged that considering socioeconomic factors to foster school diversity is constitutionally sound, so long as it is more than a 鈥減roxy to disguise when it鈥檚 in fact a racial quota.鈥 But he made no secret of his desire to pursue a more restrictive school desegregation ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.
In its most recent school segregation opinion, in 2007鈥檚 Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, the high court struck down assignment plans that considered the race of individual students when creating integrated campuses. But the justices also maintained that avoiding racial isolation in schools is a compelling state interest and can be tackled through means that include drawing student assignment boundaries in a way that decouple campus demographics from the composition of racially segregated neighborhoods.
鈥淩ace may be one component of that diversity, but other demographic factors, plus special talents and needs, should also be considered,鈥 then-Justice Anthony Kennedy .
In response to that decision, the Obama administration released guidance noting that schools when assigning students to campuses. The in 2018, arguing that the Obama-era statements 鈥減rematurely decide, or appear to decide, whether particular actions violate the Constitution or federal law.鈥 Re-implementing guidance similar to Obama鈥檚 could be a top priority for the Biden administration, integration advocates said.
Now, Pacific Legal hopes to secure a Supreme Court opinion that prohibits race-conscious admissions decisions outright, using Connecticut as one of several efforts to reach that goal.
鈥淚f we win, then obviously it would set a precedent,鈥 said Dunford, who has never interacted with Cardona directly while litigating Connecticut鈥檚 desegregation efforts. 鈥淚f we got a Supreme Court ruling, then obviously it would be binding across the entire country. Ultimately, we take cases with the hopes of trying to set precedent, so we certainly would like it if this case could end up eliminating racial quotas in education.鈥

The housing connection
In his brief remarks last year after the state reached its major court settlement with the Sheff plaintiffs, Cardona stepped up to the podium and quickly turned the conversation toward a dynamic for which he had limited 鈥 if any 鈥 control.
鈥淲hile the state鈥檚 department of education is [focused] on educational policy, we must acknowledge that racial imbalance exists to a large degree outside the schoolhouse as well,鈥 he said. 鈥淲e are committed to being a part of that broader conversation.鈥
He made similar remarks last month when Biden announced him as the education secretary pick, noting that 鈥渇or too many students, your zip code and your skin color remain the best predictor of the opportunities you鈥檒l have in your lifetime.鈥
Those comments fall in line with some school integration advocates who believe the best path forward to securing equitable schools is by tackling neighborhood segregation. Such efforts seek to limit the effects of a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that allows communities to draw up school district boundaries as tools of segregation. In the case, Milliken v. Bradley, the justices found that communities weren鈥檛 required to address segregation across school district lines.
Yet in Connecticut and nationwide, housing segregation聽 by exclusionary zoning laws has been a reliable engine for school segregation. Anecdotes suggest that Cardona has long grappled with the effects of neighborhood composition on school quality. While assistant superintendent in Meriden, the largely working-class city where he grew up, he through its neighborhoods to highlight his community鈥檚 stark economic inequities.
Locally, that would tie nearly a half-billion dollars in state school construction grants to towns鈥 willingness to offer more affordable housing. Nationally, Tegeler, of the Poverty and Race Research Action Council, said Cardona could embrace greater collaboration between the Departments of Education, Transportation and Housing and Urban Development of the Obama administration. Through the agency collaboration in 2016, the administration promoted community efforts that sought to diversify both schools and neighborhoods. Biden鈥檚 pick to lead HUD, Marcia Fudge, gives Tegeler optimism that such a collaboration could be in the making. As a Democratic congresswoman from Ohio, Fudge has to create a federal grant program focused on school integration.
鈥淯nexpectedly, to have a school integration expert at the Department of Housing and Urban Development is a great development,鈥 he said.
But Jamilah Prince-Stewart, executive director of the religious coalition FaithActs for Education, argues that lawmakers locally and elsewhere should prioritize what she said was central to the promise of integration: Access to equitable education funding. Her comments highlight how the issue of integration could get lost in the sea of priorities 鈥 particularly as the Biden administration seeks to help schools recover from the pandemic.
鈥淲e care about diversity, we care about integration, but most importantly we care about equal and equitable access to resources,鈥 she said, noting that affluent Connecticut residents have responded with 鈥渧ery racist, very classist, very problematic reactions鈥 to school regionalization efforts that she said could decouple the effects of neighborhood segregation from classroom demographics. To solve the issue, she鈥檚 calling on state lawmakers 鈥斅燼nd those who embraced the Black Lives Matter movement last summer 鈥斅爐o take action.
鈥淵ou can鈥檛 be for Black lives and want what鈥檚 best for Black students while also saying 鈥楬ands off my schools,鈥欌 she said. 鈥淣ow is really the time to put your money where your mouth is and to actually turn that rhetoric into practice and to support what is needed for Black and brown students.鈥
Under the threat of court challenges and a public perception of integration efforts that can be viewed as mixed at best, Kahlenberg of the Century Foundation said that Biden and Cardona should broach the topic through school choice and incentives 鈥 rather than a compulsory busing scheme that became a flashpoint during the Democratic debate. He agreed with Kamala Harris that integration is 鈥渁 moral imperative and opens up tremendous opportunities for children,鈥 but also agreed with Biden that compulsory busing 鈥渄idn鈥檛 always achieve the intended results.鈥
But if schools nationwide look to Hartford as an example, they鈥檒l be able to promote diversity in schools in a way that鈥檚 鈥渓egally bulletproof against right-wing attacks.鈥
鈥淭here is a third path available, and Connecticut has led the way,鈥 he said. 鈥淐ardona may be uniquely positioned to advance Joe Biden’s signature goal of healing the soul of the country and uniting the nation.鈥
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.