Commentary: Minnesota鈥檚 New, Common-Sense Approach to School Discipline Policy Should Be a Model for Other States
The recently announced collaborative agreements with five school districts and five charter schools to address practices that lead to disproportionate discipline of students of color and students with disabilities. The is to address 鈥渋mplicit bias that influences perceptions of student behavior.鈥 Two districts in which the department was unable to develop agreements are most likely due to practices alleged to have resulted in educational discrimination.
The process the department followed should serve as a model for other states, and is a refreshing change from the rhetoric being churned out in Washington to support efforts to on disproportionate discipline and subsequent to assess whether incidents of exclusionary discipline have a disproportionate impact on protected groups of students.
Rather than removing discretion from teachers and building administrators, Minnesota鈥檚 collaborative agreements seek explicitly to develop strategies designed to ensure 鈥.鈥 These goals are imminently reasonable and address the core concern (i.e., discipline practices that disproportionately exclude students from the classroom) while ensuring that building staff retain authority to manage the learning environment.
This process is commendable in that it collected and analyzed data to identify potential problems; initiated further investigations where warranted; and subsequently partnered with districts to collaborate and identify student-centered solutions. Commendably, the state did not set up to punish districts, but rather initiated discussions based on an overarching goal of ensuring that all students have access to classroom instruction essential to their success, while simultaneously ensuring schools could maintain a safe and orderly environment.
The collaborative agreements stem from analyses conducted by the department that found that relative to their white peers:
鈼徛American Indian students were 10 times as likely to be suspended or expelled;
鈼徛African-American students were eight times as likely to be suspended or expelled; and
鈼徛Students of color and students with disabilities were twice as likely to be suspended or expelled.
The majority of these actions were taken due to students being 鈥渄isruptive, disorderly, or insubordinate鈥 鈥 all notably subjective descriptions of student behavior. Having reviewed every suspension in the school district last year, former Minneapolis superintendent Bernadeia Johnson : 鈥淚f you were a white student and you were being naughty, you were called 鈥榩recocious,鈥 鈥榖right,鈥 someone who is inquisitive, and if you were a black child, it was everything that you would think of as negative.鈥
The new agreements will be in effect for three years and require districts and charter schools to:
鈼徛Continue to collect data regarding discipline policies and behavior management strategies;
鈼徛Provide semi-annual reports to the department regarding their efforts; and
鈼徛Share emerging best practices related to decreasing exclusionary discipline.
In turn, the department will partner with the Minnesota Department of Education to provide technical guidance to schools on reducing disproportionate suspensions and expulsions.
In other words, the state developed a plan that would improve practices in schools identified as struggling with high discipline rates and leverage the work to benefit schools, and the students they educate, across the state. Of note, the corrective actions focus explicitly on discipline stemming from what are arguably minor offenses 鈥 for example, eye-rolling or talking back to a staff member 鈥 as opposed to practices stemming from more serious offenses such as possession of a weapon or illegal drugs. Furthermore, the agreements prioritize schools鈥 consistently following established policies (e.g., issuing the same consequence to all students) and ensuring that staff receive training related to behavioral management.
Of course, the agreement is just the beginning, and only time will tell whether the schools will effectively invest in efforts to change adult and student behaviors that will enable more students to succeed. But Minnesota deserves a lot of credit for a transparent and data-based approach to improving discipline policies.
This model, with its common-sense approach, should be studied by education leaders nationwide.
Lauren Morando Rhim is executive director of the National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools.
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.