Could American Students and Educators Benefit From the Kinds of School Inspections Common Across Europe?
Crafting an accountability regime that is fair, accurate, and adequate to the task of assessing school quality isn鈥檛 easy. Could help? Many countries use them to gain a that goes beyond students鈥 test scores and includes each school鈥檚 leadership capacity, instructional strengths and weaknesses, historical performance, and student demographics. These programs :
- regular inspections for all schools, not merely those deemed at risk;
- use of student academic data (whether school-based or national/provincial tests);
- use of qualitative measures (such as interviews, surveys, and student absenteeism) to create performance indices; and
- extensive training for inspectors.
England鈥檚 inspection regime is the most commonly studied; it has existed since the mid-19th century and is now known as the Office for Standards in Education, Children鈥檚 Services and Skills (or Ofsted), a non-governmental body that reports directly to Parliament. There is a high standard for those who wish to join the inspectorate; the vetting and hiring process can take a year. Once appointed, the inspectors review copious school-level data before their site visits, which include classroom observations and interviews with principals and staff. Finally, inspectors produce public reports that grade each school on 27 that encompass nearly every area of a school鈥檚 atmosphere and culture, including pupil behavior, teacher efficacy, the curriculum, and the leadership鈥檚 capacity to drive improvement. Ofsted ranks schools on a spectrum from 鈥渙utstanding鈥 to 鈥渋nadequate,鈥 and monitors those in the last category frequently and in person.
While the external school-inspection model is , its consequences vary. Some countries 鈥 Austria, Iceland, and Denmark, for instance 鈥 place no sanctions upon low-performing schools, nor are reports made public. By contrast, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and England make reports public and withdraw funding or close schools that fail to reach targets in a timely fashion.
Do these inspections improve school quality and student performance?
Evaluating a universal policy is , since there are no obvious control groups. Research studies into the direct effects of inspection upon test scores are few, ambiguous, and highly contingent, influenced by the type of school and when the tests were taken 鈥 whether the same year as the inspection or the following year 鈥 see , , and . The bottom line is that evidence of a direct effect on academic performance is elusive, as the of school inspections in member countries concludes.
However, of the indirect effect of inspections suggest a positive effect: Here the mechanism seems to rest upon clear messaging about high standards. As put it,
Inspection [in the Netherlands and the U.K.] does result in significant impact on schools where clear expectations, norms, and standards are set and where stakeholders are knowledgeable about and engaged with the process. School improvement through school inspections seems to take place through indirect developmental processes rather than through more direct coercive methods.
This finding comports with Hanushek and Raymond鈥檚 that it is often the informational, rather than punitive, aspects of accountability that drive changes in school quality and student success.
What about inspections in the United States? Our closest analog to Ofsted is the reauthorization process for charter schools in several states. For example, charter schools authorized by New York State鈥檚 Board of Regents are subject to site visits for reauthorization based on that mirror Ofsted鈥檚. New York State also undertakes of schools in 鈥渇ocus districts鈥 that include clusters of underperforming schools. are also in place elsewhere, often exclusively for low-performing or Title I schools (examples and ). Vermont is currently piloting a with the intention of across all schools.
There are thus several potential uses of school inspections. Their educational, political, and cultural appeal is obvious: Inspections provide a well-rounded view of school quality 鈥 something that education leaders from across the spectrum can support; they offer for parents in an increasingly high-choice environment; and, if universal, they can we hold for schools.
Policymakers should keep several operational challenges in mind as they consider inspection regimes. The first is the possibility of excessive bureaucratic burden. on expanded measures for school success notes the 鈥渂urdens that additional measurement [could] impose on educators鈥 and students鈥 time鈥 and gives examples of school-quality reviews that were discontinued for this reason. Indeed, Ofsted came under heavy criticism from school leaders for the time involved in generating reports and preparing for visits, which led the agency to in 2016.
Cost is another issue. Estimates for English-style inspections in the United States have ranged from to annually. It is not clear how to cost out a program in advance so as to ensure its sustainability.
Third, a well-run inspectorate requires high-quality expertise 鈥 and lots of it. States that have made substantial headway in training teacher leaders (such as ) have a natural advantage, as do school systems that work with high-octane programs such as .
A final tension involves cultural attitudes about how to weigh judgment versus compliance. The English inspectorate places a high premium on human judgment 鈥 a point to which Craig Jerald returns again and again in his of the English system. School systems in the United States often favor that remove human judgment as much as possible in favor of rubrics aimed at uniform decisions. Embracing (well-trained) judgment across our school systems would be a boon to teachers and students alike, but getting there 鈥 particularly when implementing systemic programs such as school inspections 鈥 would require sustained leadership and patience.
Ashley Berner is the deputy director of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Education Policy. A may be found on the Institute鈥檚 website. Palgrave MacMillan released her book, , this year.
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.