蜜桃影视

School choice advocates say they don鈥檛 see a change in Education Secretary Betsy DeVos鈥檚 public posture on school choice, despite a recent speech that others read as a backing away from her calls for a federal school choice program.

鈥淚 wholeheartedly believe the future of choice does not begin with a new federal mandate from Washington,鈥� DeVos said during a Sept. 28 speech at Harvard University鈥檚 John F. Kennedy School of Government. 鈥淭hat might sound counterintuitive to some, coming from the U.S. secretary of education, but after eight months in Washington 鈥� and three decades working in states 鈥� I know if Washington tries to mandate choice, all we鈥檒l end up with is a mountain of mediocrity, a surge of spending, and a bloat of bureaucracy to go along with it.鈥�

Since the beginning, DeVos has always held the position that states should be out front on this issue, said John Schilling, chief operating officer at the American Federation for Children, the school choice advocacy group DeVos founded in 1998 and chaired until her appointment as secretary last year.

鈥淪he鈥檚 always believed that the states are the leaders in this,鈥� Schilling said.

Conservative think tank leaders, many of whom have opposed a federal program on the grounds that education is a state issue and federal dictates would inappropriately regulate private schools, that they took DeVos鈥檚 Harvard speech as a sign she was retreating from a big federal push.

鈥淭here’s just so little appetite for this on Capitol Hill and even within the White House,鈥� Michael Petrilli, president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, said to U.S. News. 鈥淭his shift is a sign that DeVos is acknowledging that it鈥檚 not going to happen.鈥�

But three private school choice advocates contacted by 蜜桃影视 said they don鈥檛 see a change in DeVos鈥檚 posture, and think her use of the bully pulpit will continue to boost the cause at the state level, where it matters most.

DeVos has been publicly consistent since May in saying any federal school choice program would be optional for states, Schilling said.

Addressing the AFC鈥檚 annual convention that month, she was emphatic that states not be required to participate in any hypothetical program, but at the same time excoriated legislators who don鈥檛 offer new programs.

(蜜桃影视: DeVos Emphasizes States鈥� Prerogative on School Choice, Gives No Details on Federal Expansion)

President Donald Trump has long promised a $20 billion private school choice program, most of which observers believe would come from a federal tax credit scholarship. The administration hasn鈥檛 released any details on it, and it so far hasn鈥檛 been included in Republican tax reform proposals. DeVos also proposed a $250 million voucher pilot program in this year鈥檚 budget, with the funding going to organizations that provide scholarships; neither the House nor the Senate included it in pending spending bills.

It鈥檚 consistent to advocate for a federal tax credit program but argue against a federal mandate or new federal program, as a federal tax credit would theoretically allow states to opt in, and specific regulations would be left up to states, said Darla Romfo, president of the New York City鈥揵ased Children鈥檚 Scholarship Fund, a nonprofit that provides private school scholarships across the country.

鈥淚 think she鈥檚 been pretty consistent that she doesn鈥檛 want a new mandate or a new federal program,鈥� Romfo said, later adding, 鈥淚 don鈥檛 see any inconsistency in what she鈥檚 saying.鈥�

Patricia Levesque, CEO of the Foundation for Excellence in Education, based in Florida, said the issue could be one of timing.

鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 mean you give up on it, it just means you have to wait for the appropriate time to continue to advance the issue. I would say that鈥檚 what Secretary DeVos is doing, is waiting for the appropriate time,鈥� she said. (DeVos previously served on the foundation鈥檚 board of directors, and has donated to the organization.)

The best way for DeVos to help grow the private choice movement at the state level is to continue to use her national stage, the advocates said.

鈥淚 think just as a figure who has had a lot of experience and background in this work, and the more that she keeps talking about it, that鈥檚 very empowering to people,鈥� Romfo said.

It鈥檚 important for DeVos to both give speeches at prestigious institutions, like Harvard, and 鈥済et out of the Washington bubble鈥� to highlight innovative schools, like she did with her back-to-school tour last month, Schilling said.

Beyond the bully pulpit, DeVos can help states expand their efforts by rolling back federal rules that could inhibit innovation and approving states鈥� ESSA plans, some of which authorize state takeovers or charter conversions for failing schools, Levesque said.

In a widely unpopular administration, however, DeVos is, , the least popular member. That doesn鈥檛 worry the advocates.

鈥淪chool choice has had its detractors before Betsy became secretary of education, and it will always have its detractors,鈥� Romfo said. 鈥淚 think the much more powerful thing is 鈥� there are a lot more parents who are becoming aware that they really benefit from choice.鈥�

Schilling tied her low poll numbers to months of criticism from teachers鈥� unions.

鈥淚 know that there are some people who kind of live and die by polls, but I think the more she gets out there and the more she articulates her vision for improving educational outcomes for all kids, you will see her numbers go up. It鈥檚 a good message,鈥� he said.

States are continuing to pursue new school choice initiatives in spite of the lack of enthusiasm in Washington, advocates said.

鈥淚n the big picture, educational opportunity and educational choice is not on the defensive,鈥� Levesque said.

There has been plenty of movement at the state level in 2017, she said, citing the expansion of education savings accounts in Arizona, the creation of a tax credit scholarship program in Illinois, , a new charter law in Kentucky, and , among others.

鈥淭here were several advances on giving parents more opportunities to find the educational system or building or program or service that fits their child鈥檚 need.鈥� Based on conversations that we鈥檙e having with states about next session, it looks like it鈥檚 only going to grow,鈥� she said.

The Dick & Betsy DeVos Family Foundation previously supported 蜜桃影视. Campbell Brown, co-founder of 蜜桃影视, sits on the board of directors of both the American Federation for Children and 蜜桃影视.

The Walton Family Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, Triad Foundation and the Donald & Doris Fisher Fund have contributed to both the Foundation for Excellence in Education and 蜜桃影视.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.