蜜桃影视

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled against mandatory union agency fees, reflecting a recent survey of national public opinion on the issue.

In a poll conducted by聽, a firm used by many Republican organizations, nearly two-thirds of Americans said that union members shouldn鈥檛 have to pay mandatory union fees.

The majority opposition to the fees was consistent across race, gender, even members of union households. The one area it varied was by political party. While 76 percent of Republicans supported opting out of mandatory fees, Democrats were split, with 48 percent against mandatory fees and 47 percent in favor of choice.

Members of Conservative Leaders for Education 鈥� the group that commissioned the poll 鈥� applauded the court鈥檚 ruling.

鈥淧ublic opinion is clearly on the side of the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision. Only a small percentage of people think it鈥檚 right for teachers to have their pay taken without their permission,鈥� said the group鈥檚 president, . 鈥淭eachers, and all government workers, should have a choice, and exercising that choice should not put their jobs at risk.鈥�

In its Janus ruling, the court said that the fees, which are used to fund collective bargaining and other shared benefits, were a violation of the First Amendment right to free speech for employees who don鈥檛 agree with their union鈥檚 policy.

鈥淣either an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay,鈥� Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court鈥檚 five-justice conservative majority. The ruling clarified that employees will have to opt into paying fees, a sharp departure from common practice now, when the burden is on dissenting members to opt out.

The ruling overturns a prior Supreme Court ruling, Abood, which in 1977 ruled that union members did not have to pay dues to support their union鈥檚 political activities but were still required to pay agency fees to prevent them from becoming 鈥渇ree riders.鈥� The court this time around agreed with plaintiff Mark Janus, an Illinois state worker, that when dealing with public-sector unions it鈥檚 almost impossible to distinguish political action from advocacy done to protect compensation, pensions, and other conditions of collective bargaining.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissenting opinion, criticizing the majority for overturning the precedent set in Abood.

鈥淚ts decision will have large-scale consequences,鈥� Kagan wrote. 鈥淧ublic employee unions will lose a secure source of financial support. State and local governments that thought fair-share provisions furthered their interests will need to find new ways of managing their workforces.鈥�

A 2017 also found that a majority of respondents 鈥� 44 percent 鈥� oppose the mandatory fees for teachers. But another poll, conducted by , found that public opinion was evenly split on the matter, with 45 percent of Americans supporting agency fees and 45 percent opposing.

Nearly 800 people were contacted by landline and cellphone for the poll, which had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.46 percent.聽

Disclosure: The Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation provides financial support to Conservative Leaders for Education and 蜜桃影视.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.