蜜桃影视

Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos just had the best week of her tenure so far, thanks to a well-orchestrated back-to-school tour that ended in Indiana on Sept. 15. She had a and stuck to it: We need to unleash the creativity and innovation of our schools and educators, and stop trying to make one size fit all. She also demonstrated a true commitment to sector-agnosticism 鈥� she visited traditional public schools, not just private and charter ones 鈥� and that are as far from her own conservative Christian upbringing as one can imagine 鈥� and did it all with . Well done, Madame Secretary!

The best part, in my view, came toward the end, when she the in Gary, Indiana. I鈥檓 biased; it鈥檚 run by a friend, Kevin Teasley, who has been around the choice and charter schools movement for a long time, and once even dabbled in punditry and policy wonkery. But unlike some of us unreformed reformers, he鈥檚 done penance by actually starting and running schools. He will be the first to tell you that he鈥檚 made mistakes and gotten a lot wrong, but he also learned some things over the years and is now getting some things very right.

That鈥檚 the case at 21st Century Charter, located in what may be the poorest, toughest small city in America. Kevin has come to some conclusions that don鈥檛 sound all that remarkable at first: That college 鈥� or at least postsecondary education 鈥� is essential for poor kids to make it into the middle class; and that it鈥檚 not enough to exhort his students to raise their aspirations, or even prepare them academically. For teenagers who know almost nobody who has ever scaled the cliffs to college, they need to actually experience it. As in: go to a college campus while still in high school, take real college courses, and find some success.

Thus, at Kevin鈥檚 school, 鈥渄ual enrollment鈥� is as it sounds: Students are enrolled in both high school and college at the same time. In fact, a big chunk of his budget goes to pay for tuition at local institutions of higher education; to afford it, he slimmed down his own 鈥渉igh school鈥� offerings. And it鈥檚 working. 鈥淲e鈥檝e graduated 14 students in recent years who earned their associate degree with us,鈥� he told me recently. And then there鈥檚 Raven Osborne, an incredible young woman who received her bachelor鈥檚 degree from Purdue University before graduating from high school (and earned well-deserved in the process).

鈥淥ur approach helps kids who come from homes that are mostly void of any college experience understand the rigors of college, and learn what a real college classroom is like,鈥� Teasley says. 鈥淚f they fail, we are there to support them. But we provide supports right away, so most don鈥檛 fail. We don鈥檛 just send kids off to college and say swim for your lives. We send confident kids off to college knowing they know how to swim.鈥�

This is the sort of innovative, outside-the-box 鈥渞ethinking鈥� that DeVos is encouraging. But what makes 21st Century Charter remarkable is that it鈥檚 a whole lot different from much of what passes for 鈥渄ual enrollment鈥� these days. That鈥檚 because a lot of what falls under that name is . Rather than send high school students to college campuses to take real college courses from real college professors, many states鈥� 鈥渄ual enrollment鈥� programs have high school students take so-called college courses at their high school, taught by high school teachers, with no external validation that what is learned is actually college-level. Oops.

Now, I suppose there are arguments for such an approach, mostly logistical. It鈥檚 so much easier 鈥� maybe even safer 鈥� to have high schoolers take college courses at their own high school. But how do we actually know that the courses are legit? (We don鈥檛.) And what about exposing kids to the broader college experience? (We won鈥檛.)

DeVos might argue that any form of dual enrollment is 鈥渋nnovative.鈥� But this is where innovation runs headlong into another value, namely quality. Especially because education is, in part, a commodity, and because credentials hold clear value in the labor market, there is a risk that some purveyors of education will differentiate themselves, and win consumers, by offering something of value (a diploma, college credit) for minimal effort. It鈥檚 the diploma mill problem. And it鈥檚 real.

This doesn鈥檛 mean we should give up on 鈥渋nnovation,鈥� or parental choice, much less on quality college-level work for high schoolers who can handle it. It does mean, though, that we have to strike some sort of balance between those values and the notion of standards. Otherwise an innovative drive toward 鈥渃ompetency-based learning鈥� devolves into . And a push toward 鈥渄ual enrollment鈥� becomes an easy, competency-free way to earn college credits 鈥� much less work than, say, taking and passing an Advanced Placement exam. And innovation and choice get a bad name.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.