New Wyoming Rule Would Change How Schools Teach Youngest Children to Read
Wyoming Department of Education is seeking comment on sweeping changes to reading assessment and intervention through July 31.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 蜜桃影视 Newsletter
Following years of underperformance and legislative wrangling, the Wyoming Department of Education has proposed a new set of rules for how the state鈥檚 public schools teach kindergarten through third-grade students how to read, and is seeking public input on the changes.
Drafted in response to a in state law, the rules are intended to raise reading proficiency levels by the end of third grade by improving assessment and intervention practices that identify and support students鈥 varied needs.
This legislative debate over literacy laws began about five years ago, according to Rep. Landon Brown (R-Cheyenne), who chairs the Joint Education Committee. At that point, the Legislature proposed eliminating reading assessment instruments altogether. This came at the same time that on the American reading curriculum鈥檚 widespread failure to implement evidence-based instruction methods for early literacy.
鈥淚n Wyoming we really have a K-12 and beyond literacy problem, but the major emphasis should remain in K-3,鈥 said Megan Hesser, parent advocate for Parents of Wyoming Readers and founder of Hesser Literacy Partners, an LLC offering consulting, coaching and private tutoring using evidence-based reading practices. 鈥淭he research out there shows that if you are not reading on grade level by the end of third grade, without some massive interventions, you will always be behind grade level, it doesn鈥檛 change. It鈥檚 the reason that the [National Assessment of Educational Progress] scores don鈥檛 change.鈥
The most recent NAEP tests reveal that not even met or exceeded grade-level proficiency scores in 2022. These students face a significant risk of lifelong reading difficulties.
Instead of abolishing standing reading assessments, concerned constituents 鈥 mostly parents of struggling readers 鈥 began fighting to fortify K-3 literacy laws in the state.
The up for comment are a result of their years-long efforts.
The Department of Education drafted the rules with input from a committee of stakeholders the agency selected to represent a composite of the state鈥檚 districts as well as a range of formal training and in-classroom experience.
鈥淲e wanted a full range, so we have all the way from superintendents to curriculum directors to reading interventionists,鈥 WDE Chief Education Officer Shelly Hammel said. 鈥淓very single one of the individuals that participated in our stakeholder committee had been classroom teachers first and then moved into other roles.鈥
The group also included those with special education and English-as-a-second-language backgrounds.
The department will accept input through July 31. Interested parties can also weigh in via virtual comment forums from 5:30-7 p.m., or , from 11 a.m.-12:30 p.m.
Literacy bedrock
Hesser became a leading advocate for better literacy legislation after her son fell behind in the classroom. For more than two years he struggled with undiagnosed dyslexia, dysgraphia, avoidance behavior and anxiety related to learning to read, she told the Joint Education Committee at its last meeting.
The problem, she said, is much larger than test scores.
鈥淚t鈥檚 time that the education committee considers that there鈥檚 a link between K-3 literacy and mental health,鈥 Hesser said. 鈥淩eading is the root of a lot of these pieces that seem unrelated.鈥
If you can鈥檛 read, she continued, 鈥渉ow are you going to fill out a job application? Or resume? And if you can鈥檛 do that, then how are you going to take care of yourself or your family? At some point, something鈥檚 got to give.鈥
Though Hesser responded to her family鈥檚 experience by earning a master鈥檚 degree in reading science, she said that parents and teachers were largely left out of the rules drafting process. She hopes they now participate in the reviewing process.
鈥淭here鈥檚 so many families and teachers that don鈥檛 know what they don鈥檛 know,鈥 Hesser said.
Committee co-chair Brown also said he would like to see the review process build a broader consensus base.
鈥淚 hope the parents that had been left behind [and] the parents that have had good processes in this system comment on this,鈥 he said. 鈥淚 hope that we have legislators that take note of this and understand exactly how important this is.鈥
Rules roundup
The regulate five key aspects of reading instruction:
- Screening: Establishes a list of approved screening instruments that districts can use to catch reading difficulties, defines the criteria that alternate screeners must meet and mandates that such assessments be administered three times per year. This section also provides for regulations interpretation and needs-based decision making processes.
- Evidence-based intervention and curriculum: Orders content standards for evidence-based core curriculum and establishes standards for remediation practices in the case of intervention.
- Individual reading plan and parental notification: Defines the process by which identified reading difficulties result in individual reading plans for students, and how both will be reported promptly to parents or guardians.
- Professional development: Defines the content and quantity of professional development districts will require of K-3 educators in evidence-based literacy instruction and the identification of reading difficulties.
- Reporting requirements and documentation: Establishes that all districts will record district literacy plans, individual learning plans and professional development practices; and will report to the WDE screener data, individual schools鈥 progress towards the goal of 85% of students reading on grade level and other documentation upon request.
Looking forward
Hesser鈥檚 biggest concern going forward is implementation, she said.
鈥淚 know there are pockets across the state that are a little bit resistant to what鈥檚 been happening, as far as these changes to the legislation have gone over the last handful of years,鈥 she said. 鈥淪o that鈥檚 always going to be my biggest concern,鈥 she said.
Brown notes these rules are a first attempt.
鈥淲e also need to make sure that we鈥檙e nimble enough that if this does not work, we need to be able to change our statute and change our rules package in a hurry to make sure that we鈥檙e identifying what鈥檚 wrong with our statute, what鈥檚 wrong with our rules to make sure that school districts and schools themselves are able to adapt as they need to,鈥 Brown said.聽
is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.