蜜桃影视

Correction appended Jan. 4

This article also appeared on the聽.

If there鈥檚 been one constant over the last decade in terms of teacher evaluation policies in the United States, it鈥檚 been change.

First, performance reviews incorporating student test scores became 鈥� mostly 鈥� the law of the land. Then, the academic standards that educators and their pupils are measured against 鈥� mostly 鈥� changed. And then, in many places, those standards changed again.

So, has the implementation of the federal Every Student Succeeds Act, which did away with mandates on how states measure teacher quality, calmed the roiling waters?

鈥淣o鈥� was the resounding answer from a trio of experts interviewed by Chalkbeat reporter Matt Barnum as part of a recent Education Writers Association seminar on the state of the teaching profession.

In the two years that followed ESSA鈥檚 enactment, were introduced in state legislatures, Stephanie Aragon, a policy analyst with Education Commission of the States, said at the gathering. The bulk of lawmakers鈥� efforts have concentrated on the use of student assessment data in the evaluations, according to Aragon.

The idea of factoring growth on student test scores into teacher evaluations gained widespread adoption shortly after President Barack Obama took office in 2009. As part of a federal stimulus program, the U.S. Department of Education launched the Race to the Top initiative with about $4 billion. To qualify, states had to meet several requirements, including revamping their teacher and principal evaluation systems. A key element was to incorporate test scores as one component of teacher evaluations.

But state policy on teacher evaluation has moved faster than researchers鈥� efforts to understand what works and why, Aragon said.

The risk? In many places, teachers remain skeptical.

鈥淪tates are tacking on things to evaluation systems without making sure they are trusted,鈥� Aragon said. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think the research base exists yet to say, 鈥楾his is the best practice.鈥欌��

John Papay, an assistant professor of education at Brown University, and Gina Caneva, a teacher-librarian in the Chicago Public Schools, joined Aragon on the panel.

While there is general agreement that the evaluations ought to be used to improve teaching, the three panelists said researchers have yet to figure out which promising evaluation systems might and career growth for teachers.

Papay described lessons gleaned from several efforts to implement new teacher evaluation systems. In particular, he praised the Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model. The state鈥檚 Instructional Partnership Initiative has guided teachers and principals in the use of evaluation data to design better and more personalized teacher professional development.

Papay tracked the initiative in a randomized control trial that matched teachers who had strong classroom-observation ratings on certain teaching skills with colleagues who received low ratings on those same skills. After the mentorships, students taught by the initially lower-rated teachers showed gains that were the equivalent of being taught by a teacher rated average, versus by one in the lowest 25 percent. The program has now expanded statewide, and Papay continues to track the impact.

Teacher and student outcomes have improved, according to the Tennessee Department of Education. And principals, Papay said, now do a better job of retaining teachers with high evaluation scores and dismissing those with low ones.

But lots of teachers still mistrust the evaluations, which too often are followed by scant feedback, Papay said.

鈥淎 lot of thought went into making [the evaluations] accurate,鈥� he said. 鈥淎nd not much on how to use it to give teachers useful feedback.鈥�

Caneva agreed. During the panel, she discussed the shortcomings of the system used to evaluate her 鈥� in particular, as a mechanism for .

鈥淲hen I get evaluated by my principal, that鈥檚 about one day,鈥� she said. 鈥淲hen you talk about how we鈥檙e going to improve education in America, I don鈥檛 think this is where we are going to get the biggest bang for our buck.鈥�

Because, as a teacher-librarian and writing center director, she teaches in content areas that are not subject to the annual student assessments required under federal law, Caneva described how she creates tests at the beginning and the end of each academic year for her students. She scores the exams and enters the data into a software program.

Looking back, Aragon said blowback was intense after many states adopted new teacher evaluation policies in response to the Race to the Top initiative. The ensuing decade was characterized by , with states, districts, and teachers scrambling to adjust to the new normal.

Yet when the ink dried on ESSA, states found a combination of flexibility and funding designed to help them refine their evaluations. Some states, Aragon noted, have waited to fully implement their systems and may benefit from lessons gleaned by early adopters.

Churn notwithstanding, there are places where data is being collected that highlights promising models. In addition to Tennessee, Dallas, Denver, and Newark have all put considerable energy into refining their evaluations, Aragon said. New Mexico has done a good job differentiating, or adjusting evaluations and professional development to different communities鈥� needs, she said.

鈥淚n many cases, states are struggling to get to those good evaluations,鈥� Aragon said. 鈥淚 think that鈥檚 the exciting part, if you have a meaningful evaluation system and it can lead to teacher growth.鈥�

Correction: Story was updated to聽cite Dallas as one of the examples of states/districts getting teacher evaluations right.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.