Supreme Court Won鈥檛 Hear Case of Praying Football Coach, but Conservatives Open Door for New Challenge
The Supreme Court announced Tuesday that it will not hear the case of a Washington state football coach who was fired for praying on the field after games 鈥 but seemed to open the door to further challenges seeking to expand educators鈥 on-the-job religious rights.
Joseph Kennedy was fired from his coaching job at Bremerton High School in 2015 after ignoring a warning from school district officials not to pray on the 50-yard line after football games. Lower courts upheld the district鈥檚 decision; Kennedy asked the Supreme Court to consider whether his firing amounted to a violation of his First Amendment free speech rights.
The decision not to hear the case 鈥渄oes not signify that the Court necessarily agrees with the decision … In this case, important unresolved factual questions would make it very difficult if not impossible at this stage to decide the free speech question,鈥 Justice Samuel A. Alito wrote in a聽 joined by three of the court鈥檚 other conservative justices.
Although the court declined to consider the free speech issue, Kennedy 鈥渟till has live claims鈥 under the First Amendment鈥檚 free exercise of religion guarantee and the Civil Rights Act of 1964鈥檚 ban on discrimination in employment on the basis of religion, Alito wrote.
The case 鈥渨as rejected based on technicalities, but I don鈥檛 think based on the argument,鈥 said Brett Geier, an assistant professor at Western Michigan University who studies legal issues surrounding religion and public schools.
鈥淚 have no doubt that they鈥檙e just looking for the appropriate case鈥 and that new justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, along with the conservatives already on the court, 鈥渨ill actively seek some case to return prayer in public schools, both for students as well as employees,鈥 he added.
The opinion is 鈥渁n open invitation to squarely present the question鈥 of whether to uphold a key precedent that allows employers to curtail employees鈥 religious practices in certain instances, Douglas Laycock, a professor at the University of Virginia Law School, wrote in an email to a legal listserv that he shared with 蜜桃影视.
Teachers鈥 religious expression rights have been significantly curtailed in recent decades on the theory that such beliefs could inappropriately influence students, who may have different religious beliefs but are required by law to go to school, Geier said. In recent years, bans on teachers鈥 religious exercise, including teacher-led prayer, have been expanded to football games, he added.
School district officials said that Kennedy was fired both because he was neglecting his duty to supervise football players and because his prayer could be seen as a school-endorsed religious activity.
Lower courts should have more precisely defined why Kennedy was fired, a question that would be key in a final decision, Alito wrote.
If Kennedy was fired for neglecting his duty at the time he was praying, 鈥渉is free speech claim likely would fail,鈥 Alito wrote. But if Kennedy established that he was 鈥渘ot really on duty,鈥 or on duty but able to conduct other personal activities, like making a phone call home, at the time of the prayer, 鈥渉is free speech claim would have far greater weight.鈥
鈥淎lthough petitioner鈥檚 free speech claim may ultimately implicate important constitutional issues, we cannot reach those issues until the factual question of the likely reason for the school district鈥檚 conduct is resolved,鈥 Alito wrote.
Alito went on to argue that the Ninth Circuit, generally believed to be the country鈥檚 most liberal, took an overly broad view of a ban on teachers鈥 and coaches鈥 religious expression. If the court continues to wrongly apply precedents, 鈥渞eview by this court may be appropriate,鈥 Alito wrote.
It is notable that Chief Justice John Roberts did not join the opinion with the other conservatives, Laycock wrote.
鈥淢aybe he doesn’t agree; maybe he is just being prudent. Five calling for an invitation to overrule would be significantly different from four, and the lineup would highlight the partisan divide that he is trying to reduce. Time will presumably tell what he really thinks,鈥 he added.
Four of the court鈥檚 nine justices must agree to hear a case.
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.