蜜桃影视

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 蜜桃影视 Newsletter

The Texas Education Agency on Monday released its first public school ratings in three years and despite pandemic interruptions, the number of schools that received the highest rating increased.

This year, 27.9% of 8,451 schools evaluated received an A rating. Another 46.1% received a B, 19.4% received a rating of C and 6.7% received 鈥淣ot Rated鈥� labels. Not all schools and districts are rated because some are alternative education programs and treatment facilities.

The state agency鈥檚 ratings 鈥� tied in large part to results of the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR test 鈥� are the latest metrics used to grade how well Texas public schools are performing as students emerge from the worst of the global coronavirus pandemic. Even though students returned to classroom instruction last year, surges in COVID-19 infections both last fall and winter forced some schools to close and revert back to remote instruction.

TEA Commissioner Mike Morath credited local educators with the increases seen, despite those interruptions, in each of the A and B categories and a reduction in the number of schools that received below-average grades, those in the “Not Rated” category.

鈥淭hese results show our state鈥檚 significant investment in the post-pandemic academic recovery of Texas public school students is bearing fruit,鈥� Morath said. 鈥淚鈥檓 grateful for the driving force behind this year鈥檚 success: our teachers and local school leaders.鈥�

The TEA鈥檚 ratings are determined by scores in three categories: how students perform on the STAAR test, which is given each spring; improvement in those scores; and how well schools are educating disadvantaged students. Students are tested on different subjects: reading, math, science and social students.

Districts also get an overall rating. There are a total of 1,207 school districts in Texas, and 1,195 were evaluated. Out of the districts evaluated, 33.1% got an A, 54% got a B, 9.4% got a C and 3.5% got a 鈥淣ot Rated鈥� label.

This year鈥檚 TEA ratings were done differently than in previous years. Instead of the usual A-F ratings, which were last given in 2019, the agency gave only A-C ratings.

Districts and schools that would have received a D or F instead received a 鈥淣ot Rated鈥� label this year. Schools that ranked in those bottom tiers will also be spared possible TEA sanctions during the 2022-2023 school year. Families can find their school鈥檚 accountability ratings at .

In 2019, the last time that TEA put out these ratings, 8,302 schools were rated, and 21.1% received an A, 39.5% received a B, 26.1% received a C and 13.3% received failing grades. In 2019, 1,189 districts were rated. Of those, 25.3% received an A, 56.9% received a B, 13% received a C and 4.8% received failing grades.

Texas continues to show some struggle with getting 鈥渉igh-poverty鈥� schools an A grade. Data shows that only 18% of those campuses in Texas were rated an A. The TEA labels schools as 鈥渉igh-poverty鈥� if their number of economically disadvantaged students surpasses 80%. Of the schools that received a 鈥淣ot Rated鈥� label, over half of them were 鈥渉igh-poverty鈥� schools.

Texas has about 5.4 million students in its public schools, and 60% of them are economically disadvantaged, meaning they qualify for free or reduced lunch. Out of the 8,451 schools rated this year, 564 campuses received the 鈥淣ot Rated鈥� label. Most of these 鈥淣ot Rated鈥� campuses 鈥� 499 鈥� serve students who live in some of the state鈥檚 poorest communities.

While there is work to be done with Texas鈥� poorer schools, Morath said, the increase among the A-rated schools 鈥� a rise seen after the pandemic interrupted classroom instruction 鈥� means the state is on the right track to catch students up to pre-pandemic levels.

This spring鈥檚 STAAR results big gains in reading. While math scores did increase from the dips seen in 2021, they revealed that Texas students still have work to do to catch up to their pre-pandemic test score levels.

State officials say the ratings help parents decide on a school or a district and help hold those districts accountable to parents and taxpayers. Opponents of the system say it harms schools that serve poor communities as they usually get the failing grades and face potential state sanctions such as getting shut down.

Matthew Gutierrez, superintendent of the Seguin Independent School District, received a 鈥淣ot Rated鈥� label for his district even though more than half of his campuses received a C or above, as his district faltered on other criteria.

Gutierrez believes what hurt his district is that during the pandemic there was a decrease in the number of kids going to college, pursuing technical careers or joining the military. Because of the spread of COVID-19 infections since 2019, the number of students who took the ACT or SAT or attained industry certifications or dual credit decreased, he said.

鈥淚鈥檓 really disheartened about the overall district grading,鈥� Gutierrez said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a very complex, complicated system. I feel like the overall score does not reflect the progress made as a school district.鈥�

The Seguin district also had two middle schools that received 鈥淣ot Rated鈥� labels, and both of them are majority Hispanic and the number of students who are economically disadvantaged is higher than the state average. But Gutierrez is hopeful that these two campuses will soon improve like his district鈥檚 other schools did that have a higher average of low-income students.

鈥淲e certainly believe our students have the capacity 鈥� we just need the right levels of support,鈥� he said.

This article originally appeared in a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.