The Kids Could Determine the Future of Democracy
Pineda: Nine million students who are now 16 or 17 years old will be voting for president in 2028. What are we doing to prepare them?
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 蜜桃影视 Newsletter
Kids. Zoomers. Whippersnappers.
You know, those bipedal mysteries who are bopping around with a simultaneous look of disdain and indifference. They鈥檙e listening to music with wired headphones and seem to levitate underneath the baggy, acid washed jeans and windbreakers of the late nineties. There鈥檚 probably bubble tea involved.
In 2028, these kids are voting. In two years, these nine million 16 and17 year olds, zits and all, may be all that stand between us and a failed state.
The ramifications of the 2028 election are looming monumental on the horizon.
Rally, organize, vote. This is the mantra champions for democracy are pushing. But they鈥檙e not pushing it to the kids 鈥 and boy, should they.
In its Human Rights Watch warns of an 鈥渁uthoritarian wave鈥 that has come into power across the globe, including in the United States. 鈥淎uthoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power,鈥 the report states.
Throughout history authoritarian playbooks have hinged on capturing the hearts and minds of young people. The idea is simple: You capture the youth early enough and you capture the future.
This was a key pillar in the Soviet strategy to flip eastern Europe after World War II: simultaneously cripple the education system and funnel to a swath of vulnerable teens eager to form a collective identity.
The far right in America has internalized this playbook and are committed to realizing it. What does the targeting of these young people look like?
It’s the 鈥榤anosphere鈥. It’s the podcasters and YouTubers and influencers who are modeling a misogynist and toxic 鈥榤asculine鈥 grind that appeals to looking for inclusion and identity in a world working to deprioritize the patriarchy. The content and community is the bait, the white noise of far right ideologies consumed through osmosis is the hook.
The manosphere is beginning to tap into the cohort of young Latinos, a marginalized bloc desperate to assimilate and be seen as American. They don鈥檛 want to accept they鈥檙e latching onto a movement intent on their further disenfranchisement.
This scheme transcends class and gender. It鈥檚 the likes of Erika Kirk, Nick Fuentes, and leaders within Turning Point USA who are flooding teen spaces and media to eloquently rail against a diversifying America and progressive and empathetic principals in ways that are overtly racist and laced with nationalistic rhetoric.
This prong of the movement doesn鈥檛 rely solely on social media; it鈥檚 in schools, too. In the last year, the number of in US schools 鈥 Turning Point鈥檚 high school program 鈥 has doubled to 3,000.
Lawmakers are entwined with these groups, receiving and funneling money toward . They also appear in podcasts and rub shoulders with influencers because they need them to convert young, future voters.
Why? Because they are desperate to maintain and squash opportunities for America to become a democracy that is representative and elected of its population and their ideals, that is: a youthful generation of progressive people of color.
As America grows ever more diverse, these power brokers are fervent to recruit a new generation that will maintain their minority rule.
The problem is that it鈥檚 working.
The other problem is that champions of democracy aren鈥檛 doing the same thing to cultivate the next generation of civically engaged young people who might be able to thwart this movement.
It鈥檚 difficult to understand why pro-democratic movements haven鈥檛 leaned into cultivating the democratic agency of the 16- and 17-year-old population prior to the voting age. They just don鈥檛.
There is obvious ageism toward young people, and a failure to get behind the science of adolescent development. I also believe it is playing out at scale 鈥- a manifestation of our country’s unwillingness to accept the future is racially and ethnically diverse, multilingual and much better informed than ever before.
Even when there are attempts to organize around teens, it鈥檚 done poorly and with little effect because these young people harbor a growing level of disdain for the priorities and ideologies of both political parties and organizers. They see a civic system that doesn鈥檛 look like them, doesn鈥檛 have the same priorities of them, and has not to have their best interest in mind.
In a collaborative study led by the Center for Interdisciplinary Research, Collaboration, Learning, and Engagement, 60% of young people agree the political system doesn鈥檛 work. Black and Brown youth are . Why should they?
Most chilling, respondents in the study said they do not 鈥渂uy into the value of democracy鈥, and are sympathetic to authoritarian governments. This population is expected to account for over .
So, what can be done? A lot in just two years.
One of the first priorities is to protect and reinvigorate 鈥 particularly those serving the most diverse and historically marginalized populations. It is here the pipeline for future voters is restored. It’s not just teaching how a bill becomes a law, it鈥檚 teaching kids how to build democratic power. Amid systematic attacks on public education, basic and sound civic education is no longer a guarantee, and local leaders must be held accountable to ensure access to strong curricula.
The education system can鈥檛 do all the heavy lifting. Out-of-school time civic education and participatory engagement programs need to be designed and run all over the country. That鈥檚 particularly important for two distinct communities: those whose voting rights have been systematically targeted throughout history and those of privilege and access who鈥檝e never felt a need to show up to the polls.
Beyond programs and education, conversations about why this matters should be taking place at the dinner table, on the courts, on the streets, on line, in the cafeterias and community events. Young people need to rally around the idea of representative democracy. The refrain should be simple: kids are voting in 2028 鈥 are they prepared?
It鈥檚 important to remember that our nation is not preparing young people for politics or partisanship: We are preparing them for democracy.
Voting is not partisan, it is democratic. Civic engagement is not political, it is democratic. It鈥檚 not a matter of pushing issues or candidates. . It鈥檚 a matter of preparing them to engage and trusting in their and . They鈥檝e to always land on the .
I鈥檝e said before, the entire youth civic ecosystem must be reformed 鈥 a project that is decades of work in the making. Still, I believe one well-prepared generation could radically alter the civic landscape and discourse, and be the catalyst to creating a pipeline of young voters that will lead increased turnout, local level engagement, more representative candidates, increased accountability, and a new age in which majority and representative rule is the status quo and not a pipe dream.
In the meantime, remember democracy is under threat. There is a movement looking to overturn our republic, and it hinges on capturing the hearts/minds of young people. Young people could have an incredible role to play over the coming years. Where anti-democratic movements recognize the power of youth, the collective good must too 鈥 and that collective must rally around young people before it鈥檚 too late.
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.