Waters: Where Have You Gone, Cory Booker?
Cory Booker has been lost in the horde of Democratic candidates vying to defeat President Donald Trump in 2020, polling at a meager and barely making it onto the debate stage. But he can turn this around by proudly owning his role in Newark鈥檚 upward educational trajectory that he described a 鈥渃auldron of educational creativity鈥 that was 鈥渓iberating the choice of our parents.鈥
And, as a ballast to the off-kilter crowd of wannabes careening wildly left, the New Jersey senator might want to read issued by the New Jersey Children鈥檚 Foundation that describes the academic growth for many of Newark鈥檚 students 鈥 those enrolled in both traditional and charter schools 鈥 as 鈥渞eal鈥漚nd 鈥渕eaningful.鈥
He鈥檚 his own worst enemy the remarkable changes in Newark鈥檚 traditional and charter schools. Between 2006 and 2018 across low-income New Jersey urban areas, Newark鈥檚 average test scores improved to the 78th percentile from the 39th percentile in reading and math, according to Jesse Margolis and Eli Groves, the analysts behind NJCF鈥檚 鈥 The share of black students attending a school that beat the state proficiency average more than quadrupled over the same period. I call that a talking point essential to a campaign, one far more 鈥減rogressive鈥 than the horde鈥檚 propensity to genuflect to the educational status quo.
Margolis and Groves deliberately 鈥渄o not argue that any single reform or set of reforms caused the gains documented here.鈥
I鈥檓 happy to help. Right now the bulk of Democratic presidential hopefuls are locking arms in a fact-free attempt to discredit public charter schools, the very schools that have saved many Newark families from being consigned to a broken school system. My party, which has long defined itself as wedded to equity and social justice, especially for those who have long been disenfranchised from the American Dream, is filing for divorce.
As a daughter of two teachers union members and an advocate for school choice, I鈥檓 angry. As a lifelong Democrat, I鈥檓 ashamed. After all, Democrats for Education Reform鈥檚 shows that 86 percent of African-American voters and 67 percent of Latino voters say that parents should have 鈥渁 variety of public school options for their kids 鈥 including charter schools, magnet schools, and career academies 鈥 no matter where they live or how much money they have.鈥 A recent also shows high support among parents of color for charter schools.
Yet support among white Democrats has dropped, and those are the voters deemed worthy of wooing. The top candidates, apparently afflicted with DeVos Derangement Syndrome, causing sufferers to denounce any position vaguely associated with the president鈥檚 entourage, are lining up to oppose school choice.
Seriously? Please, aspiring leaders of the free world, let explain to you that 鈥渢his … is another arrogant and backhanded way to tell black families, I know what鈥檚 best for your children 鈥 you don鈥檛.鈥 Or visit a charter school in Newark where children disproportionately 鈥渂eat the odds,鈥 according to the聽, due to the educational advantages afforded to charter school students.
Maybe I鈥檓 being too harsh. Maybe the Democratic candidates have fallen for Dale Russakoff鈥檚 (or, to be kinder, one published too soon) that Newark鈥檚 charter school expansion was a bust. Yet the truth is that then-Superintendent Cami Anderson, villainized in Russakoff鈥檚 book as a tone-deaf harridan, actually did the dirty work of closing the worst schools and scoring a teachers鈥 contract that rewards highly effective teachers, especially those willing to work in the city鈥檚 most challenging schools.
After she was run out of town, Chris Cerf took over as superintendent and pushed through further reforms, albeit with a gentler touch. He even became buddies with Mayor Ras Baraka, who now supports charter schools, and tweaked the that facilitates school choice for families in both the traditional and charter sectors to ensure that the poorest children and those with disabilities are more evenly spread among district and charter schools.
During that turbulent period, many anti-choice pundits predicted doom: Charter schools will bankrupt the district! Children with disabilities will be clustered in traditional district schools! The charters will cherry-pick the best students and dumb down the district!
Time for a reality check. None of that happened, even with more than 30 percent of Newark students attending charters. Enrollment in the district is up for the first time in years, as is academic growth, as documented in the NJCF report. There鈥檚 enough money in district schools for . Charter schools are increasing and diversifying their special education programs: Here鈥檚 a profile of one, , where 24 percent of students have disabilities that range from minor to severe.
That鈥檚 a long way from a district that the state described in 1994 as 鈥溾 in its mission of serving children; where 1 out of every 2 Newark students didn鈥檛 graduate from high school and average SAT scores were 311 in verbal and 363 in math.
But, as the NJCF report notes, 15,000 students still attend 鈥渓ow proficiency, low growth鈥 schools. These schools, which cluster in Newark wards where most black families live, include , where average SAT scores are 396 in reading and 380 in math, not much better than 25 years ago. Yet the horde has deemed that passing the Democratic litmus test on charters and pandering to teacher union leaders is more important than creating seats for those students in high-performing district and charter schools.
Would Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren or Kamala Harris send their children to Malcolm Shabazz? Would you, Senator Booker? Of course not. But the fringe left sings to them like the Sirens of Greek mythology, wooing them to shipwreck on rocky coasts.
The students? Collateral damage.
I do hear the hum of voices trying to drown out those fringy Sirens. 聽compares opposition to the Hyde Amendment 鈥 which chips away at reproductive health choices for poor women 鈥 to Democratic candidates鈥 promises to stymie charter school growth, which chip away at school choices for poor families.
鈥淲hat Senator Sanders is saying with his attempt to limit charter schools is telling black parents, who overwhelmingly support charters, that they can鈥檛 send their kids to charters anymore,鈥 Amy Wilkins of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools told the ,
reports on charges by black advocates that Sanders is 鈥渢rying to strip the rights of black parents to determine the education of their children.鈥 And DFER National President formerly a Newark mayoral candidate, told NBC, 鈥淏ernie Sanders apparently thinks he, in Vermont, knows better than low-income African-American and Hispanic families in their cities about what鈥檚 best for their children.鈥
And, lest we forget, the most recent standard bearer for Democratic values, President Barack Obama, is a strong proponent of charter schools.
Heck, even the new district strategic plan notes that 鈥渢he expansion of charter schools in Newark and the alignment and coherence which organize the systems in the large charter school networks have become a local proof point for the role of a robust central system in supporting and improving schools.鈥
What to do, Senator Booker? Do you, who once to save a young neighbor, disappear into the pandering crowd of anti-choice zealots who would abandon Newark students to academic ashes at Shabazz? Or do you wear your role as a major player in Newark鈥檚 education renaissance as a bright badge of honor?
Come back, Senator, and say yes to charters. Be the real progressive in the race.
Laura Waters writes about education policy and politics at NJ Left Behind, New York School Talk, Education Post and other publications. She served for 12 years on her local school board in Lawrence, New Jersey, and was president for nine of those years.
Did you use this article in your work?
We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.