蜜桃影视

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 蜜桃影视 Newsletter

In September, 蜜桃影视 published Robert Pondiscio鈥檚 opinion piece discussing how people without strong reading skills聽lack what it takes 鈥渢o effectively weigh competing claims鈥� and 鈥渃an鈥檛 reconcile conflicts, judge evidence or detect bias.鈥� He adds, 鈥淭hey may read the words, but they can鈥檛 test the arguments.鈥�

To make his case, Pondiscio relies on the skill level needed to achieve a proficient score or better on National Assessment of Educational Progress, a level that only 30% of tested students reached on 2024鈥檚 Grade 8 reading exam. Only 16% of Black students and 19% of Hispanics were proficient or more.

Yet naysayers argue that the NAEP standard is simply set too high and that NAEP鈥檚 sobering messages are inaccurate. There is no crisis, according to these naysayers.

So, who is right?

Well, of eighth graders from Kentucky indicates that it鈥檚 Pondiscio, not the naysayers, who has the right message about the NAEP proficiency score. And, Kentucky鈥檚 data show this holds true not just for NAEP reading, but for NAEP math, as well.

Kentucky offered a unique study opportunity. Starting in 2006, the Bluegrass State began testing all students in several grades with exams developed by the ACT, Inc. These tests include the ACT college entrance exam, which was administered to all 11^th grade public school students, and the EXPLORE test, which was given to all of Kentucky鈥檚 public school eighth graders.

Both the ACT and EXPLORE featured something unusual: 鈥淩eadiness Benchmark鈥� scores which ACT, Inc. developed by comparing its test scores to actual college freshman grades years later. Students reaching the benchmark scores for reading or math had at least a 75% chance to later earn a 鈥淐鈥� or better in related college freshman courses.

So, how did the comparisons between Kentucky鈥檚 benchmark score performance and the NAEP work out?

 Analysis found close agreement between the NAEP proficiency rates and the share of the same cohorts of students reaching EXPLORE鈥檚 readiness benchmarks. 鈥�

For example, in Grade 8 reading, EXPLORE benchmark performance and NAEP proficiency rates for the same cohorts of students never varied by more than four percentage points for testing in 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13 or 2014-15.

The same, close agreement was found in the comparison of NAEP grade 8 math proficiency rates to the EXPLORE math benchmark percentages. 

EXPLORE to NAEP results were also examined separately for white, Black and learning-disabled students. Regardless of the student group, the EXPLORE鈥檚 readiness benchmark percentages and NAEP鈥檚 proficient or above statistics agreed closely.

Doing an analysis with Kentucky鈥檚 ACT college entrance results test was a bit more challenging because NAEP doesn鈥檛 provide state test data for high school grades. However, it is possible to compare each student cohort鈥檚 Grade 8 NAEP performance to that cohort鈥檚 ACT benchmark score results posted four years later when they graduated from high school. Data for graduating classes in 2017, 2019 and 2021 uniformly show close agreement for overall average scores, as well as for separate student group scores.

It鈥檚 worth noting that all NAEP scores have statistical sampling errors. After those plus and minus errors are considered, the agreements between the NAEP and the EXPLORE and ACT test results look even better.

The bottom line is: Close agreement between NAEP proficiency rates and ACT benchmark score results for Kentucky suggests that NAEP proficiency levels are highly relevant indicators of critical educational performance. 鈥婽hose claiming NAEP鈥檚 proficiency standard is set too high are incorrect.

That leaves us with the realization that overall performance of public school students in Kentucky and nationwide is very concerning. Many students do not have the reading and math skills needed to navigate modern life. Instead of simply rejecting the troubling results of the latest round of NAEP, education leaders need to double down on building key skills among all students.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.