The Los Angeles Unified School District and Service Employees International Union Local 99 reached a tentative agreement around 2 a.m. Tuesday Pacific Time. 

United Teachers Los Angeles and Associated Administrators of Los Angeles agreed to tentative contracts Sunday night. If SEIU had not reached an agreement, all three unions would have for the first time in the nation’s second-largest district.

鈥淲e are pleased to announce that we have reached an agreement in principle with SEIU Local 99 that will allow schools to be open,鈥� the district said in a . 鈥淟os Angeles Unified and SEIU Local 99 teams will continue to work together to finalize the details of a tentative agreement.鈥�

The union, which represents more than 30,000 bus drivers, teachers鈥� assistants, custodians and cafeteria workers, had of bad-faith bargaining and retaliation. The teachers union and its 37,000 members had planned to walk out with the SEIU local in solidarity, as it did when the union an unfair labor charge strike in 2023. This time, the administrators union, which represents more than 3,000 principals and assistant principals, had planned to strike in support as well.

鈥淏ecause of our members’ unity and readiness to take action, we secured major wins 鈥� including significant improvements to wages and hours; stronger protections against subcontracting; increased staffing; and we successfully stopped layoffs for (information technology) workers,鈥� Local 99 said in a Tuesday . 鈥淭his is what collective power looks like.鈥�

The union and the district have been bargaining for two years, said Blanca Gallegos, the union鈥檚 communications director.

鈥淐urrently, the average wage in (our union) is about $35,000, which is below poverty for a family of four,” she said before the agreement was reached. “We’re also looking to increase hours 鈥� because the district relies on a lot of part-time work 鈥� so about 80% of Local 99 members are working less than eight hours a day.鈥�

The district previously a 13% raise, but the union it wasn鈥檛 enough to provide a livable salary for its members. The union also wanted staff to be able to work more hours. Gallegos said many employees were restricted to a number of hours that鈥檚 just under the threshold needed to qualify for health benefits 鈥� a reason why picketing would have been classified as an . The district didn鈥檛 respond to a request for comment about the unfair labor charge.

鈥淒uring these two years of negotiations, the district has taken a lot of actions that are retaliatory. One of them is they reduce the hours of thousands of members so that they’re not eligible for health care benefits 鈥� I mean, like 15 minutes short of being eligible,鈥� Gallegos said. 鈥淲e see that as undermining the contract.鈥�

罢耻别蝉诲补测鈥檚 includes a 24% pay increase over three years and minimum work hour schedules for specific positions. 

The district had told all three unions it can’t afford huge raises, but bargaining leaders pointed to a $5 billion reserve fund. Los Angeles Unified has the account is dwindling amid a projected . 

United Teachers Los Angeles Sunday that it agreed to a tentative two-year contract that increases the average salary by 13.86%, with a minimum raise of 8%. The union had rejected an April 1 that included a 10% raise over three years with a one-time 3% bonus for this school year.

The new contract, which will expire in 2027, also includes four weeks of paid parental leave; more psychologists, psychiatric social workers and counselors; lower class sizes; and stipends for teachers if class sizes exceed the limit.

鈥淭he flexing of our collective power forced LAUSD to direct significant funding into critical priorities identified by UTLA members in the Win Our Future contract demands,鈥� the union said in a .

United Teachers Los Angeles has been a key player in a statewide effort to improve pay and working conditions during contract negotiations this year. The , coordinated by the California Teachers Association, asked union locals in 32 districts to focus demands around wages, staffing, fewer layoffs and school closures. It also aims to pressure the state to increase school funding.

Associated Administrators of Los Angeles was 12% raises over two years, with a chance to renegotiate in the third year of its next contract. The district to an 11.65% salary increase. Union members stipends if they work in a high-needs school or are a school鈥檚 single administrator, and 40 hours a year of professional training.

鈥淭his moment did not happen by accident. It happened because 90% of you voted yes to authorize a strike,鈥� union President Maria Nichols said to her members in a . 鈥淚t happened because you trusted our union. It happened because you stood firm, you stood together and you refused to be overlooked. Your courage at that vote changed the tone at the bargaining table. Your unity shifted the balance of power. Your perseverance made this moment possible.鈥�

The unions haven鈥檛 announced a timetable for ratifying the contracts. 

In case of a strike, the district had planned to at community food sites and offer classroom lesson packets. But some parents said loss of learning and other resources would have lasting negative impacts on their children.

Maria Palma, founder of the parent advocacy group , said the pandemic combined with other local school interruptions, such as immigration enforcement raids, have caused students to miss multiple days of school.

鈥淢any parents are very concerned about the learning loss that has happened,鈥� she said. 鈥淢ost recently, we had a protest where teachers were telling students that they should walk out of schools and protest against ICE. The loss of so many school days for some kids that are now, for example, in high school, over all these years, has been considerable.鈥�

A strike would have been especially devastating for Indigenous and immigrant families, said Evelyn Aleman, founder of , a local parent advocacy nonprofit. The district serves roughly 30,000 immigrant students, and 25% of them are undocumented, according to the .

Aleman said language barriers had made it difficult for immigrant parents to keep up with district updates about the strike. 

Undocumented parents don鈥檛 feel safe enough to pick up materials or food distributed by the district because of fears of deportation, she said. Many parents involved with Our Voice also work as street vendors and are the single guardians of multiple children, making it impossible to find child care.

鈥淲hen LAUSD says there’s going to be food centers, some parents don’t have vehicles. It’s very frustrating,鈥� Aleman said. 鈥淪ome children will remain unwatched, because some of the parents will leave the children in the home and sometimes leave cameras. That’s how they monitor the children 鈥� that’s what is happening when these situations arise.鈥�

Of course, things didn’t work out as planned. United Teachers Los Angeles voted to boycott the extra days. Then, after negotiations, the district rescheduled them for winter and spring breaks, irking SEIU Local 99, the union representing school support workers. And whatever benefit the extra days might have brought was undone by the three-day walkout organized by both unions March 21 to 23.

One would think that, going forward, the district might try a different approach to adding instructional days, and that the teachers union might consider a different response.

But who are we kidding?

Last week, the L.A. school board . 鈥淭he new instructional calendars address the need to mitigate learning loss by shortening the winter recess and extending options for summer programming,鈥� Superintendent Alberto Carvalho said. The plan is to shorten the three-week winter break to two weeks.

The seven-member school board unanimously approved the changes, and the press release includes positive comments from five of them. It also states that the district “undertook an extensive process of gathering input through surveys, focus groups and presentations from families, staff and labor partners.”

Unfortunately for Carvalho and the board, those surveys, focus groups and input from labor partners all indicated .

The district justified the change on the grounds that three weeks off “creates challenges for our neediest families that must be considered in decision-making.” Also, most large districts in other states have a two-week break, as do most districts in southern California.

Not one to overlook an opportunity for activism, the teachers union immediately filed an unfair labor practice charge, and ramped up an organizing drive against the change.

“School calendar changes are mandatory subjects of bargaining and UTLA leadership immediately sent a demand to bargain to the district,” . “This calendar move exemplifies Carvalho鈥檚 refusal to bargain in good faith and his willful disdain of worker rights. By openly disregarding labor law and ignoring the voices of parents and staff, Carvalho continues to prove that he is not a leader. The school board鈥檚 approval demonstrates a failure to hold Carvalho accountable.”

that calendar dates are “at the sole discretion of the superintendent and the Board of Education,” and that the district held two meetings to discuss the calendar with its unions 鈥� but UTLA sent a representative to only one.

Carvalho and the board seem to have learned nothing from their previous encounter on this issue and are blithely waving the red cape in front of the charging bull. The union will gore them again, but one wonders how often it can continue to place itself on the side of less school versus more.

Mike Antonucci鈥檚 Union Report appears most Wednesdays; see the full archive.

So it went last week with Los Angeles Unified School District Superintendent Alberto Carvalho.

Carvalho was forced to shutter schools while the district鈥檚 30,000 support employees, led by SEIU Local 99, went on a three-day strike. Members of United Teachers Los Angeles walked out in solidarity.

The day after the strike ended, Carvalho and the union announced a tentative agreement. The three-year deal raised salaries by a reported 30%. Carvalho called it a “.”

It鈥檚 historic, in the sense that most of it takes place in the past.

The agreement contains a 6% pay hike retroactive to July 2021, another 7% retroactive to July 2022 and yet another 7% to take effect this July. In January 2024, the district will raise all support employee wages by $2 an hour. The district and the union both say this constitutes another 10% increase for the average employee.

Nevertheless, it鈥檚 not the amount that鈥檚 going to cause headaches for Carvalho, the school board, parents and students in the near future. The district and the union weren鈥檛 oceans apart on the money before the strike occurred. Where Carvalho went wrong was in the timeline of the settlement.

Lost in all the happiness and relief about the contract is that the strike supposedly wasn鈥檛 about wages and benefits. Such a walkout would have been illegal, since the union hadn鈥檛 completed all the procedural steps before calling a strike. SEIU did so to . 

SEIU accused the district of interrogating workers about union meetings and threatening to fire them if they walked out. The union even claimed that food service workers were locked in a cafeteria to prevent them from voting on a strike. Taking these accusations at face value, the district could not have prevented the strike, short of admitting it had committed these violations.

. An unfair labor practices strike is legal if unfair labor practices have occurred. These haven鈥檛 been adjudicated, and if they鈥檙e found to be baseless, the union will be penalized.

But it won鈥檛 matter. The reality is that the walkouts prompted Carvalho and the board to settle on the union鈥檚 terms. So what happens to the district鈥檚 future?

There isn鈥檛 going to be much of a lull. 鈥淐arvalho has been put on notice that he better move on our demands,鈥� . 鈥淚f that movement is not enough to settle the contract that UTLA members deserve, we will move to the next round of this fight.鈥�

The union wants a 20% raise over a two-year contract. But the contract expired in June 2022, so the two years are this school year and next. It鈥檚 clear the teachers aren’t reluctant to strike, and SEIU Local 99 will be sure to back them up. So we might see a repeat of last week鈥檚 actions, only this time it will be the teachers union organizing an unfair labor practices strike, with SEIU striking in solidarity.

Carvalho might be able to head it off by caving early, but the reprieve would be only temporary. The new contracts would both expire in June 2024, right about the time all federal COVID subsidies will have run out. How much labor peace will Carvalho be able to buy then?

He seems unaware of his impending fate. 鈥淭his agreement鈥檚 going to make a lot of superintendents very nervous,鈥� . 鈥淎nd that鈥檚 a good thing.鈥�

We鈥檒l see who is the most nervous superintendent a year from now.

Mike Antonucci鈥檚 Union Report appears most Wednesdays; see the full archive.