Utah teachers unions are reeling after a bill that would bar them from bargaining collectively and conducting operations on school property was forwarded to the governor鈥檚 desk Feb. 6.

Lawmakers who favor the measure, , say it was introduced to ensure transparency in public-sector unions and protect taxpayer resources, but educators say it will only make a job that鈥檚 already full of challenges more difficult.

While it doesn鈥檛 prevent employees from joining a union, the bill prohibits public agencies 鈥� which employ teachers, firefighters, police officers and county workers, among others 鈥� from 鈥渞ecognizing a labor organization as a bargaining agent鈥� and 鈥渆ntering into collective bargaining contracts.鈥� 

The bill’s state Senate co-sponsor, Republican Kirk Cullimore, argued during a that 鈥渦nions are negotiating against what could be seen as the taxpayer sometimes.鈥� At that same meeting, Republican state Sen. John Johnson said collective bargaining can undermine the public interest.

鈥淧ublic-sector unions, unlike their private counterparts, negotiate with government officials over taxpayer-funded resources,鈥� he said. 鈥淭his dynamic can lead to decisions that prioritize union interest over the needs and welfare of the general populace.鈥�

Other lawmakers who support HB267 said it ensures that unions operate with transparency and fairness.

But some opponents of the bill, including educators and legislators, charge it was created to retaliate against the Utah Education Association, which is The association is the state鈥檚 largest teachers union, with 18,000 members.

In a Jan. 25 , Republican state Sen. Todd Weiler called the measure a 鈥渒nee-jerk reaction鈥� to the legislature鈥檚 frustration with the union. 

鈥淏ecause we can鈥檛 constitutionally pass a bill that just punishes the UEA, we鈥檙e including firefighters and other unions that didn鈥檛 necessarily draw the ire of the legislature,鈥� Weiler said. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think our best policy directives are achieved if we鈥檙e trying to be vindictive or reactive to something.鈥�

Like most of Utah鈥檚 teachers unions, Canyons Education Association in Salt Lake County doesn鈥檛 engage in collective bargaining. But President Krista Pippin said the chapter regularly negotiates with the district for improved policies and working conditions. 

鈥淭he school board administration didn’t support [the bill]. The superintendents association did not support it, because they all know the importance of advocacy work that is so essential to the profession,鈥� Pippin said.

Lawmakers who support HB267 unions could still advocate for their interests under the bill, but opposing senators and Utah鈥檚 largest teachers union disagree.

State Senate Minority Leader Luz Escamilla said the measure will have a lot of unintended consequences.

鈥淥ur first responders, our teachers, are doing probably the most difficult jobs that we have right now,鈥� Escamilla said. 鈥淭heir ability to feel protected and have representation in conversations 鈥� they are not going to be able to do it individually with their management. That is just impossible.鈥�

The Utah Education Association said that HB267 will weaken advocacy because it cuts off access to schools, making it harder for unions to do their work. 

The bill would bar unions from using public property for free. Members would have to pay to use their school space or rent another public location for union activity.

Jenny Graviet, president of Weber Education Association, said she would no longer be able to visit schools during lunch to collect teacher opinions or meet with district administrators to discuss union priorities.

鈥淚 do a lot in the evening, but when I talk to members, then I have to catch them during their lunchtime. But I’m still using the building,鈥� Graviet said. 鈥淲hich means I鈥檓 not going to be listening to voices.鈥�

Under the bill, collective bargaining contracts that are in place by May would remain in force until they expire. The union in Weber, located north of Salt Lake City, is one of the few in Utah that does engage in collective bargaining to secure teacher contracts.

Now, the chapter will have to act quickly to finalize a multi-year contract with the district and get it ratified by the school board by the May deadline.

鈥淲e’re going to have to just cut off the ideas that we were hoping to do,鈥� Graviet said. 鈥淔or example, special education teachers had reached out to me, begging for more time because they’ve got to get caught up on their caseloads.鈥�

Graviet said she鈥檚 already losing members because educators are getting misinformation about the bill, thinking it will outlaw teachers unions.

鈥淚f we have reduced membership, we cannot pay for things 鈥� in the end, you get a very weakened union,鈥� she said. 鈥淲hen you have weakened locals, you have a weakened state who can’t work on legislation, who can’t advocate on our behalf. It kind of makes me sad.鈥�