蜜桃影视

Explore

5 Top Takeaways from a New Publication and a Brookings Webinar on Single-Parent Families

Photo by on

Top Takeaways is a series of recaps from important conversations, town halls, webinars and virtual events about early learning.

聽live in sin颅gle-par颅ent fam颅i颅lies, and they are far more likely to experience food and housing insecurity, and other hazards of poverty. , published in the Fall 2022 volume of the ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, delves into the policy possibilities for these families. On Dec. 1, the Brookings Institution held a webinar featuring many of the publication鈥檚 contributors.

鈥淐hild poverty in rich countries is especially compelling,鈥 editors Janet C. Gornick, Laurie C. Maldonado and Amanda Sheely assert , 鈥渂ecause it is rooted not so much in scarce aggregate resources but mainly in distributional arrangements, both private and public.鈥

Here are 5 top takeaways:

1. Compared to other high-income countries, the United States does little to support single-parent families. The consequences are dire, especially for the youngest children, whose brains are undergoing such rapid development. 鈥淎dequate poverty relief doesn鈥檛 come cheaply,鈥 said Ive Marx, professor at the University of Antwerp and director of the Centre for Social Policy, likening the layers of support to a policy lasagna. 鈥淚t takes universal benefits and targeted supplements to keep families out of poverty.鈥

Zachary Parolin, senior fellow at the Center on Poverty & Social Policy at Columbia University, presented findings that showed volatility in poverty rates during the pandemic but also ways that federal stimulus and relief smoothed it out. Thomas Biegert from the London School of Economics looked at child care benefits, dispelling the myth that generous benefits are a disincentive to work.

2. No single-parent families are alike. They vary by age, race, socioeconomic status and more. Keeping the heterogeneity of these families in mind should prevent academics and policymakers alike from making generalizations. 鈥淒espite the seemingly strong relationship between single motherhood prevalence and racial inequality in child poverty in the United States, a growing literature casts doubt on the explanatory power of family structure,鈥 University of Pennsylvania sociologist Regina S. Baker writes .

3. Promoting marriage remains a risky 鈥減roposition.鈥 University of Maryland economist Melissa Kearney noted appreciatively that the ANNALS volume steers clear of culture war arguments (see video below to relive 1992, if you dare) and advocated for the continued separation of benefits from parental marital status. 鈥淔ocusing on marriage promotion misses the point,鈥 said Baker, observing that family structure operates differently for different racial and ethnic groups.

Isabel Sawhill, senior fellow at Brookings 鈥 whose 2014 book underscored the importance of choosing to become parents 鈥 sounded the alarm on 2022鈥檚 Dobbs v. Jackson decision.

4. 鈥淵ou can learn about effective policy from studying other countries,鈥 stated Maldonado. Calling the ANNALS publication a goldmine for policymakers, Gornick enumerated such factors as benefit level, duration and financing as the variables that should be studied.

And yet, in so many ways, the United States isn鈥檛 the same as other rich countries. Baker noted that poverty risk factors such as health problems and unemployment disproportionately affect Black and Latino mothers whether they are married or not.

Eric Rodriguez of highlighted the particular nature of race in this country and the living with undocumented parents.

5. There鈥檚 more than one kind of child support. Of the 10.5 million single-parent households in the U.S., nearly three-quarters are mother-only. An recommends guaranteeing a modest amount of public support to single-parent households. 鈥淢any of the policy dilemmas we saw are common across high-income countries,鈥 said Rutgers University professor Laura Cuesta, one of the paper鈥檚 coauthors, lamenting the singular lack of robust support here.

emphasizes the value of social involvement and provision of in-kind support. 鈥淣onresident fathers are more than a check,鈥 said Kearney. 鈥淭hey can be part of the children鈥檚 lives.鈥

The panelists speculated on the likelihood of policy shifts in the coming years. While perceiving political support for many progressive ideas, Doug Besharov (University of Maryland School of Public Policy) said, 鈥淭he sale hasn鈥檛 been made yet.鈥 Taking the long view, Irwin Garfinkel (Columbia University School of Social Work), predicted, 鈥淭hese ideas will become politically feasible at some point, because they鈥檙e good policy.鈥

This story originally published on Early Learning Nation and is now archived on 蜜桃影视. Learn more here.

Republish This Article

We want our stories to be shared as widely as possible 鈥 for free.

Please view 蜜桃影视's republishing terms.





On 蜜桃影视 Today