蜜桃影视

Join our zero2eight Substack community for more discussion about the latest news in early care and education.

Oregon has a reputation for its breathtaking natural beauty, ranging from its thick forests to the craggy Pacific coast. It is well known for its wine flowing from the Willamette Valley and for being home to progressive, quirky Portland. And it鈥檚 been long lauded as an early childhood trailblazer, having launched the first for struggling families in 1976 and one of the in 1987. Since 2016, the state has moved forward with major investments in pre-K as well as for young children from low-income families. 

But recently, the state鈥檚 legislature has taken steps aimed at rolling back some of the Beaver State鈥檚 early care and education progress 鈥� and now it鈥檚 on a path toward becoming the canary in the coal mine for child care retrenchment. 

Child care advocates have had their eyes on Oregon for some time as the state has developed and implemented its vision for a comprehensive statewide early childhood system focused on access and equity. In 2016, the state launched Preschool Promise, a statewide publicly funded pre-K system for children from low- and moderate-income families. In 2020, voters in Multnomah county in Portland approved the Preschool for All measure, which is designed to build a universal pre-K system while protecting infant and toddler slots, all funded by a tax on high-earning households in the county.

But Oregon鈥檚 notable progress in early childhood is now on rocky ground as the state pulls back on its funding for these systems. 

In June, the Democratic-controlled Oregon Legislature $20 million from Preschool Promise, a 10% decrease that, per Oregon Public Broadcasting, could necessitate cutting slots for up to 640 students. Other early childhood programs unrelated to preschool, such as those focused on early health and parenting education, will also see substantial cuts.

Separately, in June, there was a last-minute attempt by Oregon legislators to slip an amendment on the interaction between state and local tax systems that would have sunset Multnomah County鈥檚 universal pre-K system by 2027 by forbidding Multnomah from further collecting the tax. The effort was supported by Oregon鈥檚 Democratic governor, Tina Kotek, who that 鈥淚f Portland does not rebound in the way we think it can, the downstream impacts on our economy will end up costing our most vulnerable and lowest income Oregonians the most.鈥� Specifically, Kotek and others have expressed . In the face of vociferous opposition by Multnomah politicians and advocates, as well as research suggesting those fears were largely unfounded, the effort .

The driving force behind the Preschool Promise cuts and the proposed wind-down of Multnomah鈥檚 universal pre-K program is a poor economic forecast that has led to declining projections of corporate taxes, which is the primary way Oregon funds its statewide early childhood programs. As one of the top exporting states in the nation, Oregon’s economy 鈥� and corporate tax base 鈥� is particularly exposed to effects from the Trump administration鈥檚 tariff policies. The legislature was clearly, of Democratic Sen. Lisa Reynolds, 鈥渞eluctant鈥� to take these actions. 

The big question is whether Oregon is an outlier or a trendsetter. So far, the evidence points toward trendsetter. While few states with specialized funding sources or especially healthy economies, such as New Mexico and Connecticut, have been making major progress in early care and education, many states have begun taking worrying steps to walk back funding in 2025. That鈥檚 not surprising. As states begin to of the Republican reconciliation package, which will require more state backfilling of Medicaid and SNAP funding if they want to avoid benefit cuts, they鈥檙e looking for ways to cut costs.

For instance, as of January, many major counties in Colorado, including Denver, have instituted for their state鈥檚 child care subsidy program due to underfunding and compliance with Biden-era policy changes, which required increased per-child reimbursement rates and lower parent copays. In May and August, respectively, and also enacted subsidy enrollment freezes. In early September, Indiana announced it was by 10% to 35% 鈥� based on the age group of children served 鈥� to help close a state budget gap, a move which will likely cause many programs to stop accepting children from families that use subsidies. And Arkansas announced that it was going to a regardless of program quality, which would result in an average rate cut of nearly 20% 鈥� and the move after widespread protestation.

In each of these cases, there are state eccentricities at play. Colorado, for example, sets subsidy reimbursement rates and parent copays by county, not at the state level, meaning the new federal regulations have caused uneven consequences. In Indiana, critics point to the state鈥檚 new school voucher system as a big reason for their budget shortfall. 

The common theme, however, is that child care keeps finding itself on the chopping block despite all the political champions that have been cultivated across the years.

This retreat, even among states that have been leaders in early learning, sends a major warning signal to advocates, philanthropists and policymakers. The reality is that it鈥檚 easier to cut an issue area like child care, which while popular with voters, isn鈥檛 particularly powerful politically, than to slash services protected constitutionally, like schools, or those with huge constituencies, like health care or business. State legislators may be reluctant to drop the knife on child care, but we can already see that they will.

Ultimately, a federally-funded solution for child care is needed to smooth out state differences, but so long as states are holding the bag, it is important that as they envision, develop and implement solutions, leaders are seeking out ways to protect the progress they make. That might include creative alliances with family policy advocates working on school-aged or elder care, building sustainable child care funding streams like dedicated trust funds and to early care and education. 

Efforts like these can help insulate child care from the vagaries of state budgeting and the chaos of the current administration鈥檚 policies. If reliably liberal Oregon, a state that鈥檚 prioritized early childhood for years, is starting to make child care cuts, then every state should be preparing to stand firm in the face of the approaching storm. 

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 蜜桃影视鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.