The Connection between Maternal Health and Infant Health: Asking the Difficult Questions
鈥淥ur health system is failing women鈥 are the unequivocal opening words of a by Early Learning Nation partner, the Center for the Study of Social Policy (CSSP). As the report makes clear, these systemic failures are especially catastrophic for one group: 鈥淣ot only are black women at higher risk of experiencing poor maternal health outcomes, their young children are also at greater health risk of experiencing poor birth outcomes such as pre-term birth and low birth weight鈥攑otential causes of infant mortality.鈥 The CSSP article acknowledges the , introduced by Sen. Kamala Harris, which focuses on implicit biases experienced by Black women during pre- and post-natal care.
I spoke to Dr. Joia Adele Crear-Perry, founder of not one but two efforts that confront these issues 鈥 and 鈥攁bout the scope of the crisis and what can be done.聽 Crear-Perry, a mother of three children, formerly served as director of clinical services for the City of New Orleans Health Department. In 2016, she addressed the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to urge a human rights framework to improve maternal mortality.
鈥淚t鈥檚 in my nature to ask 鈥榳hy,鈥欌 Crear-Perry explains. For example, upon discovering that the State of Missouri would expand Medicaid access to moms addicted to opioids, her immediate question was: Why just opioids? Is there a medical reason to include just this one type of addiction that happens to be associated with poor white people? At the forum where she brought up this concern, the author of the provision said he never thought if it that way.
鈥淲e should have fixed this during the crack epidemic,鈥 Crear-Perry insists, recalling indignantly that when a mother, a pharmacist, went to the emergency room as a patient, the staff treated her like she was there for the free drugs.
The matter of who is and is not eligible for Medicaid coverage has life-and-death consequences. of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 鈥淢edicaid coverage improves families鈥欌痜inancial security鈥痓y protecting them from medical debt and helping them stay healthy for work. Medicaid coverage also has long-term health, educational and financial benefits for鈥痗hildren.鈥
It follows, therefore, that if the program is implemented in ways that discriminate against one group, there will be adverse health consequences鈥攕uffering and, let鈥檚 face it, death鈥攆or people in that group, especially if they are already vulnerable due to other social and economic factors. Crear-Perry points to Medicaid expansion in Michigan, which has work requirements, but only in Detroit and Flint, ostensibly because these two urban areas have low unemployment rates.
These problems don鈥檛 just affect Black people, though. When Crear-Perry lived in Louisiana, she could see how the racial narrative around public benefits affected all low-income families. 鈥淲hen poor whites start to think, 鈥楾hese are for poor people,鈥 they mean poor black people, and it makes them less likely to avail themselves of supports,鈥 she notes.
- Expand access to health care coverage for poor and low-income women through the Medicaid expansion. This includes ensuring continuity of coverage for women during the post-natal period (up to a year after giving birth).
- Advance preventative measures such as comprehensive reproductive health education and health screenings through the utilization of resources provided by Title X family planning programs.
- Continue to build research on maternal mortality and morbidity by prioritizing the collection and dissemination of data that can be disaggregated by race and ethnicity.
- Mitigate racial disparities in maternal and infant health outcomes through the implementation of culturally competent and culturally responsive policies that provide for training to address implicit bias.
Crear Perry does believe there are reasons to be optimistic about the overall health and race picture in the United States. 鈥淪tudents and residents are more receptive,鈥 she says, noting that are pushing medical schools to address racism in their curricula.
Take one extremely revealing index: the perception among medical professionals that black skin doesn鈥檛 鈥渇eel pain鈥 as much as white skin. The bias is less prevalent among younger doctors. 鈥淵ou can鈥檛 end racism,鈥 she admits, 鈥渂ut you can fundamentally change the acceptability of it.鈥
For Crear-Perry, one of the most promising鈥攁nd underappreciated鈥攁venues for systemic change in the field of health care in general and reproductive justice specifically has to do with how Medicare (and private insurance companies) calculates the dollar value of a medical intervention. Initiated in 1989, the Relative Value Unit (RVU) system establishes the value of 7,000 distinct nonsurgical and physician services. (The late economist Uwe Reinhardt wrote two wonkish but relatively clear-sighted blogs about RVUs for The New York Times in 2010; see and .)
鈥淭he inherent devaluation of women鈥檚 health is embedded in our RVU system,鈥 Crear-Perry says. 鈥淗ospital CEOs often call Labor and Delivery Units a loss leader. They know that it is underfunded, but they have data that shows women make the household decisions on health care. So they are willing to lose money on the care for a woman because she will bring her husband to that hospital for a knee surgery that they do make money off of, or cardiac catheterization for their fathers.鈥
Making health care professionals more aware of systemic biases may be an uphill battle, but advocates like Crear-Perry are making vital progress.
This story originally published on Early Learning Nation and is now archived on 蜜桃影视. Learn more here.